|
||
Article |






Department of Medical Physiology and Sports Medicine, Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands; and
Todd Franklin Cardiac Research Laboratory, The Children's Heart Center, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322
The effects of intercellular coupling conductance on the activity of two electrically coupled isolated rabbit sinoatrial nodal cells were investigated. A computer-controlled version of the "coupling clamp" technique was used in which isolated sinoatrial nodal cells, not physically in contact with each other, were electrically coupled at various values of ohmic coupling conductance, mimicking the effects of mutual interaction by electrical coupling through gap junctional channels. We demonstrate the existence of four types of electrical behavior of coupled spontaneously active cells. As the coupling conductance is progressively increased, the cells exhibit: (a) independent pacemaking at low coupling conductances, (b) complex dynamics of activity with mutual interactions, (c) entrainment of action potential frequency at a 1:1 ratio with different action potential waveforms, and (d) entrainment of action potentials at the same frequency of activation and virtually identical action potential waveforms. The critical value of coupling conductance required for 1:1 frequency entrainment was <0.5 nS in each of the five cell pairs studied. The common interbeat interval at a relatively high coupling conductance (10 nS), which is sufficient to produce entrainment of frequency and also identical action potential waveforms, is determined most by the intrinsically faster pacemaker cell and it can be predicted from the diastolic depolarization times of both cells. Evidence is provided that, at low coupling conductances, mutual pacemaker synchronization results mainly from the phase-resetting effects of the action potential of one cell on the depolarization phase of the other. At high coupling conductances, the tonic, diastolic interactions become more important.
Key Words: action potentials electrophysiology coupling clamp gap junctions perforated patch clamp
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. L. Veruki, L. Oltedal, and E. Hartveit Electrical Synapses Between AII Amacrine Cells: Dynamic Range and Functional Consequences of Variation in Junctional Conductance J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2008; 100(6): 3305 - 3322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. A. M. Kusters, W. P. M. van Meerwijk, D. L. Ypey, A. P. R. Theuvenet, and C. C. A. M. Gielen Fast calcium wave propagation mediated by electrically conducted excitation and boosted by CICR Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, April 1, 2008; 294(4): C917 - C930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Fahrenbach, R. Mejia-Alvarez, and K. Banach The relevance of non-excitable cells for cardiac pacemaker function J. Physiol., December 1, 2007; 585(2): 565 - 578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Wilders Dynamic clamp: a powerful tool in cardiac electrophysiology J. Physiol., October 15, 2006; 576(2): 349 - 359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. P. de Boer, M. A.G. van der Heyden, M. B. Rook, R. Wilders, R. Broekstra, B. Kok, M. A. Vos, J. M.T. de Bakker, and T. A.B. van Veen Pro-arrhythmogenic potential of immature cardiomyocytes is triggered by low coupling and cluster size Cardiovasc Res, September 1, 2006; 71(4): 704 - 714. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Lei, C. Goddard, J. Liu, A.-L. Leoni, A. Royer, S. S.-M. Fung, G. Xiao, A. Ma, H. Zhang, F. Charpentier, et al. Sinus node dysfunction following targeted disruption of the murine cardiac sodium channel gene Scn5a J. Physiol., September 1, 2005; 567(2): 387 - 400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Krogh-Madsen, P. Schaffer, A. D. Skriver, L. K. Taylor, B. Pelzmann, B. Koidl, and M. R. Guevara An ionic model for rhythmic activity in small clusters of embryonic chick ventricular cells Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2005; 289(1): H398 - H413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Young and P. Zhang Tissue-Level Bioelectrical Signals as the Trigger for Uterine Contractions in Human Pregnancy Reproductive Sciences, October 1, 2004; 11(7): 478 - 482. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. O Verkerk, R. Wilders, J. G Zegers, M. M G J van Borren, J. H Ravesloot, and E E. Verheijck Ca2+-activated Cl- current in rabbit sinoatrial node cells J. Physiol., April 1, 2002; 540(1): 105 - 117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.R. Boyett, H. Honjo, and I. Kodama The sinoatrial node, a heterogeneous pacemaker structure Cardiovasc Res, September 1, 2000; 47(4): 658 - 687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. W. Joyner, Y.-G. Wang, R. Wilders, D. A. Golod, M. B. Wagner, R. Kumar, and W. N. Goolsby A spontaneously active focus drives a model atrial sheet more easily than a model ventricular sheet Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2000; 279(2): H752 - H763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Wagner, T. Namiki, R. Wilders, R. W. Joyner, H. J. Jongsma, E. E. Verheijck, R. Kumar, D. A. Golod, W. N. Goolsby, and A. C. G. van Ginneken Electrical interactions among real cardiac cells and cell models in a linear strand Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 1999; 276(2): H391 - H400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. W. Joyner, R. Kumar, D. A. Golod, R. Wilders, H. J. Jongsma, E. E. Verheijck, L. Bouman, W. N. Goolsby, and A. C. G. Van Ginneken Electrical interactions between a rabbit atrial cell and a nodal cell model Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 1998; 274(6): H2152 - H2162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
|