Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF, 190K) PPT slides of all figures Alert me when this article is cited Citation Map Services Email this article Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new content in the JGP Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Smith, S. S. Articles by Dawson, D. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Smith, S. S. Articles by Dawson, D. C. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

Original Article

Physical Basis for Lyotropic Anion Selectivity Patterns

Stephen S. Smith^a, Erich D. Steinle^b, Mark E. Meyerhoff^b, and David C. Dawson^a

^a From the Department of Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
^b From the Department of Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
Department of Physiology & Pharmacology, Oregon Health Sciences University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., L-334, Portland, OR 97201.503-494-4352

dawsonda{at}ohsu.edu

The cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) Cl channel exhibits lyotropic anion selectivity. Anions that are more readily dehydrated than Cl exhibit permeability ratios (P_S/P_Cl) greater than unity and also bind more tightly in the channel. We compared the selectivity of CFTR to that of a synthetic anion-selective membrane [poly(vinyl chloride)–tridodecylmethylammonium chloride; PVC-TDMAC] for which the nature of the physical process that governs the anion-selective response is more readily apparent. The permeability and binding selectivity patterns of CFTR differed only by a multiplicative constant from that of the PVC-TDMAC membrane; and a continuum electrostatic model suggested that both patterns could be understood in terms of the differences in the relative stabilization of anions by water and the polarizable interior of the channel or synthetic membrane. The calculated energies of anion–channel interaction, derived from measurements of either permeability or binding, varied as a linear function of inverse ionic radius (1/r), as expected from a Born-type model of ion charging in a medium characterized by an effective dielectric constant of 19. The model predicts that large anions, like SCN, although they experience weaker interactions (relative to Cl) with water and also with the channel, are more permeant than Cl because anion–water energy is a steeper function of 1/r than is the anion–channel energy. These large anions also bind more tightly for the same reason: the reduced energy of hydration allows the net transfer energy (the well depth) to be more negative. This simple selectivity mechanism that governs permeability and binding acts to optimize the function of CFTR as a Cl filter. Anions that are smaller (more difficult to dehydrate) than Cl are energetically retarded from entering the channel, while the larger (more readily dehydrated) anions are retarded in their passage by "sticking" within the channel.

Key Words: hydration energy • anion binding • pseudohalides • ion-selective electrodes • anion channels

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. S. Smith, X. Liu, Z.-R. Zhang, F. Sun, T. E. Kriewall, N. A. McCarty, and D. C. Dawson Cftr: Covalent and Noncovalent Modification Suggests a Role for Fixed Charges in Anion Conduction J. Gen. Physiol., October 1, 2001; 118(4): 407 - 432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents