Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF, 204K) PPT slides of all figures Alert me when this article is cited Citation Map Services Email this article Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new content in the JGP Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tiwari-Woodruff, S. K. Articles by Papazian, D. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tiwari-Woodruff, S. K. Articles by Papazian, D. M. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

Original Article

^a From the Department of Physiology and Molecular Biology Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90095-1751
Department of Physiology, Box 951751, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1751.310-206-5661

papazian{at}mednet.ucla.edu

Using a strategy related to intragenic suppression, we previously obtained evidence for structural interactions in the voltage sensor of Shaker K⁺ channels between residues E283 in S2 and R368 and R371 in S4 (Tiwari-Woodruff, S.K., C.T. Schulteis, A.F. Mock, and D.M. Papazian. 1997. Biophys. J. 72:1489–1500). Because R368 and R371 are involved in the conformational changes that accompany voltage-dependent activation, we tested the hypothesis that these S4 residues interact with E283 in S2 in a subset of the conformational states that make up the activation pathway in Shaker channels. First, the location of residue 283 at hyperpolarized and depolarized potentials was inferred by substituting a cysteine at that position and determining its reactivity with hydrophilic, sulfhydryl-specific probes. The results indicate that position 283 reacts with extracellularly applied sulfhydryl reagents with similar rates at both hyperpolarized and depolarized potentials. We conclude that E283 is located near the extracellular surface of the protein in both resting and activated conformations. Second, we studied the functional phenotypes of double charge reversal mutations between positions 283 and 368 and between 283 and 371 to gain insight into the conformations in which these positions approach each other most closely. We found that combining charge reversal mutations at positions 283 and 371 stabilized an activated conformation of the channel, and dramatically slowed transitions into and out of this state. In contrast, charge reversal mutations at positions 283 and 368 stabilized a closed conformation, which by virtue of the inferred position of 368 corresponds to a partially activated (intermediate) closed conformation. From these results, we propose a preliminary model for the rearrangement of structural interactions of the voltage sensor during activation of Shaker K⁺ channels.

Key Words: conformational changes • transmembrane segment • voltage clamp • cysteine mutagenesis

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Cestele, T. Scheuer, M. Mantegazza, H. Rochat, and W. A. Catterall Neutralization of Gating Charges in Domain II of the Sodium Channel {alpha} Subunit Enhances Voltage-Sensor Trapping by a {beta}-Scorpion Toxin J. Gen. Physiol., September 1, 2001; 118(3): 291 - 302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. R. Silverman, C.-Y. Tang, A. F. Mock, K.-B. Huh, and D. M. Papazian Mg2+ Modulates Voltage-Dependent Activation in Ether-a-Go-Go Potassium Channels by Binding between Transmembrane Segments S2 and S3 J. Gen. Physiol., November 1, 2000; 116(5): 663 - 678. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents