The Journal of General Physiology
Cell MicroControls
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published 1 August 2000. doi:10.1085/jgp.116.2.191
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 987K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JGP
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fenton, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Muller, R. U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fenton, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Muller, R. U.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
© The Rockefeller University Press, 0022-1295/2000//191/ $5.00
Journal of General Physiology, Volume 116, Number 2, 2000


Original Article

Conjoint Control of Hippocampal Place Cell Firing by Two Visual Stimuli

I. the Effects of Moving the Stimuli on Firing Field Positions



André A. Fentona, Gyorgy Csizmadiab, and Robert U. Mullerb

a Institute of Physiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic 14220
b State University of New York-Health Science Center at Brooklyn, Brooklyn, New York 11203
State University of New York- Health Science Center at Brooklyn, 450 Clarkson Ave., Brooklyn, NY 11203.718-270-3103

bob{at}fasthp.hippo.hscbklyn.edu

To better understand how hippocampal place cell activity is controlled by sensory stimuli, and to further elucidate the nature of the environmental representation provided by place cells, we have made recordings in the presence of two distinct visual stimuli under standard conditions and after several manipulations of these stimuli. In line with a great deal of earlier work, we find that place cell activity is constant when repeated recordings are made in the standard conditions in which the centers of the two stimuli, a black card and a white card, are separated by 135° on the wall of a cylindrical recording chamber. Rotating the two stimuli by 45° causes equal rotations of place cell firing fields. Removing either card and rotating the other card also causes fields to rotate equally, showing that the two stimuli are individually salient. Increasing or decreasing the card separation (card reconfiguration) causes a topological distortion of the representation of the cylinder floor such that field centers move relative to each other. We also found that either kind of reconfiguration induces a position-independent decrease in the intensity of place cell firing. We argue that these results are not compatible with either of two previously stated views of the place cell representation; namely, a nonspatial theory in which each place cell is tuned to an arbitrarily selected subset of available stimuli or a rigid map theory. We propose that our results imply that the representation is map-like but not rigid; it is capable of undergoing stretches without altering the local arrangement of firing fields.

Key Words: hippocampal place cells • cognitive maps • topological stretch


© 2000 The Rockefeller University Press


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JGPHome page
A. A. Fenton, G. Csizmadia, and R. U. Muller
Conjoint Control of Hippocampal Place Cell Firing by Two Visual Stimuli: II. a Vector-Field Theory That Predicts Modifications of the Representation of the Environment
J. Gen. Physiol., August 1, 2000; 116(2): 211 - 222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents