Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF, 427K) PPT slides of all figures Correction (v117,p191) Alert me when this article is cited Citation Map Services Email this article Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new content in the JGP Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Juusola, M. Articles by Hardie, R. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Juusola, M. Articles by Hardie, R. C. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

Original Article

I. Response Dynamics and Signaling Efficiency at 25°C

Mikko Juusola^a and Roger C. Hardie^b

^a Physiological Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EG, United Kingdom
^b Department of Anatomy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3DY, United Kingdom
Physiological Laboratory, Downing Street, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EG, UK.44-1223-333-840

mj216{at}cus.cam.ac.uk

Besides the physical limits imposed on photon absorption, the coprocessing of visual information by the phototransduction cascade and photoreceptor membrane determines the fidelity of photoreceptor signaling. We investigated the response dynamics and signaling efficiency of Drosophila photoreceptors to natural-like fluctuating light contrast stimulation and intracellular current injection when the cells were adapted over a 4-log unit light intensity range at 25°C. This dual stimulation allowed us to characterize how an increase in the mean light intensity causes the phototransduction cascade and photoreceptor membrane to produce larger, faster and increasingly accurate voltage responses to a given contrast. Using signal and noise analysis, this appears to be associated with an increased summation of smaller and faster elementary responses (i.e., bumps), whose latency distribution stays relatively unchanged at different mean light intensity levels. As the phototransduction cascade increases, the size and speed of the signals (light current) at higher adapting backgrounds and, in conjunction with the photoreceptor membrane, reduces the light-induced voltage noise, and the photoreceptor signal-to-noise ratio improves and extends to a higher bandwidth. Because the voltage responses to light contrasts are much slower than those evoked by current injection, the photoreceptor membrane does not limit the speed of the phototransduction cascade, but it does filter the associated high frequency noise. The photoreceptor information capacity increases with light adaptation and starts to saturate at 200 bits/s as the speed of the chemical reactions inside a fixed number of transduction units, possibly microvilli, is approaching its maximum.

Key Words: vision • retina • information • neural coding • graded potential

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. T. Gonzalez-Bellido, T. J. Wardill, R. Kostyleva, I. A. Meinertzhagen, and M. Juusola Overexpressing Temperature-Sensitive Dynamin Decelerates Phototransduction and Bundles Microtubules in Drosophila Photoreceptors J. Neurosci., November 11, 2009; 29(45): 14199 - 14210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Niven, M. Vahasoyrinki, M. Juusola, and A. S. French Interactions Between Light-Induced Currents, Voltage-Gated Currents, and Input Signal Properties in Drosophila Photoreceptors J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2004; 91(6): 2696 - 2706. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. C. Hardie Phototransduction in Drosophila melanogaster J. Exp. Biol., March 12, 2002; 204(20): 3403 - 3409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents