The Journal of General Physiology
Scientifica: Experts in Electrophysiology
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published 1 July 2001. doi:10.1085/jgp.118.1.45
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 304K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JGP
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pusch, M.
Right arrow Articles by Conti, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pusch, M.
Right arrow Articles by Conti, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
© The Rockefeller University Press, 0022-1295/2001//45/ $5.00
Journal of General Physiology, Volume 118, Number 1, 2001


Original Article

Mechanism of Block of Single Protopores of the Torpedo Chloride Channel Clc-0 by 2-(p-Chlorophenoxybutyric) Acid (Cpb)

Michael Puscha, Alessio Accardia, Antonella Liantoniob, Loretta Ferreraa, Annamaria De Lucab, Diana Conte Camerinob, and Franco Contia

a Istituto di Cibernetica e Biofisica, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, I-6149 Genova, Italy
b Unità di Farmacologia, Dipartimento Farmacobiologico, Università di Bari, 70126, Bari, Italy
Istituto di Cibernetica e Biofisica, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via de Marini 6, I-16149 Genova, Italy.39-0106475-500

pusch{at}barolo.icb.ge.cnr.it

We investigated in detail the mechanism of inhibition by the S(–) enantiomer of 2-(p-chlorophenoxy)butyric acid (CPB) of the Torpedo Cl channel, ClC-0. The substance has been previously shown to inhibit the homologous skeletal muscle channel, CLC-1. ClC-0 is a homodimer with probably two independently gated protopores that are conductive only if an additional common gate is open. As a simplification, we used a mutant of ClC-0 (C212S) that has the common gate "locked open" (Lin, Y.W., C.W. Lin, and T.Y. Chen. 1999. J. Gen. Physiol. 114:1–12). CPB inhibits C212S currents only when applied to the cytoplasmic side, and single-channel recordings at voltages (V) between –120 and –80 mV demonstrate that it acts independently on individual protopores by introducing a long-lived nonconductive state with no effect on the conductance and little effect on the lifetime of the open state. Steady-state macroscopic currents at –140 mV are half-inhibited by ~0.5 mM CPB, but the inhibition decreases with V and vanishes for V ≥ 40 mV. Relaxations of CPB inhibition after voltage steps are seen in the current responses as an additional exponential component that is much slower than the gating of drug-free protopores. For V ≤ –40 mV, where a significant inhibition is observable for the CPB concentrations used in this study (≤10 mM), the concentration dependence of its onset kinetics is consistent with CPB binding according to a bimolecular reaction. At all voltages, only the openings of drug-free protopores appear to contribute significantly to the current observed at any time. Lowering internal Cl hastens significantly the apparent "on" rate, suggesting that internal Cl antagonizes CPB binding to closed pores. Vice versa, lowering external Cl reduces the apparent rate of CPB dissociation from open pores. We studied also the point mutant K519E (in the context of the C212S mutant) that has altered conduction properties and slower single protopore gating kinetics. In experiments with CPB, the mutant exhibited drastically slowed recovery from CPB inhibition. In addition, in contrast to WT (i.e., C212S), the mutant K519E showed also a significant CPB inhibition at positive voltages (≥60 mV) with an IC50 of ~30–40 mM. Altogether, these findings support a model for the mechanism of CPB inhibition in which the drug competes with Cl for binding to a site of the pore where it blocks permeation. CPB binds preferentially to closed channels, and thereby also strongly alters the gating of the single protopore. Since the affinity of CPB for open WT pores is extremely low, we cannot decide in this case if it acts also as an open pore blocker. However, the experiments with the mutant K519E strongly support this interpretation. CPB block may become a useful tool to study the pore of ClC channels. As a first application, our results provide additional evidence for a double-barreled structure of ClC-0 and ClC-1.

Key Words: ClC • slow gate • double barreled • anion channel • clofibric acid


© 2001 The Rockefeller University Press


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JGPHome page
X.-D. Zhang, P.-Y. Tseng, W.-P. Yu, and T.-Y. Chen
Blocking Pore-open Mutants of CLC-0 by Amphiphilic Blockers
J. Gen. Physiol., December 29, 2008; 133(1): 43 - 58.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JGPHome page
X.-D. Zhang and T.-Y. Chen
Amphiphilic Blockers Punch through a Mutant CLC-0 Pore
J. Gen. Physiol., December 29, 2008; 133(1): 59 - 68.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JGPHome page
X. Chen, H. Kalbacher, and S. Grunder
Interaction of Acid-sensing Ion Channel (ASIC) 1 with the Tarantula Toxin Psalmotoxin 1 is State Dependent
J. Gen. Physiol., February 27, 2006; 127(3): 267 - 276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp PhysiolHome page
M Pusch, G Zifarelli, A. R Murgia, A Picollo, and E Babini
Channel or transporter? The CLC saga continues
Exp Physiol, January 1, 2006; 91(1): 149 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JGPHome page
J. A. de Santiago, K. Nehrke, and J. Arreola
Quantitative Analysis of the Voltage-dependent Gating of Mouse Parotid ClC-2 Chloride Channel
J. Gen. Physiol., November 28, 2005; 126(6): 591 - 603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
R. Estevez, M. Pusch, C. Ferrer-Costa, M. Orozco, and T. J. Jentsch
Functional and structural conservation of CBS domains from CLC chloride channels
J. Physiol., June 1, 2004; 557(2): 363 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JGPHome page
S. Traverso, L. Elia, and M. Pusch
Gating Competence of Constitutively Open CLC-0 Mutants Revealed by the Interaction with a Small Organic Inhibitor
J. Gen. Physiol., August 25, 2003; 122(3): 295 - 306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JGPHome page
A. Accardi and M. Pusch
Conformational Changes in the Pore of CLC-0
J. Gen. Physiol., August 25, 2003; 122(3): 277 - 294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JGPHome page
M.-F. Chen and T.-Y. Chen
Side-chain Charge Effects and Conductance Determinants in the Pore of ClC-0 Chloride Channels
J. Gen. Physiol., July 28, 2003; 122(2): 133 - 145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JGPHome page
M. Duffield, G. Rychkov, A. Bretag, and M. Roberts
Involvement of Helices at the Dimer Interface in ClC-1 Common Gating
J. Gen. Physiol., February 3, 2003; 121(2): 149 - 161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
A. Liantonio, A. Accardi, G. Carbonara, G. Fracchiolla, F. Loiodice, P. Tortorella, S. Traverso, P. Guida, S. Pierno, A. De Luca, et al.
Molecular Requisites for Drug Binding to Muscle CLC-1 and Renal CLC-K Channel Revealed by the Use of Phenoxy-Alkyl Derivatives of 2-(p-Chlorophenoxy)Propionic Acid
Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2002; 62(2): 265 - 271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents