Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF, 355K) PPT slides of all figures Alert me when this article is cited Citation Map Services Email this article Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new content in the JGP Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Liu, X. Articles by Dawson, D. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Liu, X. Articles by Dawson, D. C. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

Original Article

Covalent Modification of Cysteine-Substituted Channels Expressed in Xenopus Oocytes Shows That Activation Is Due to the Opening of Channels Resident in the Plasma Membrane

Xuehong Liu^a,b, Stephen S. Smith^a,b, Fang Sun^b, and David C. Dawson^a,b

^a Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR 97201
^b Department of Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
Department of Physiology/Pharmacology, L334, 3181 SW. Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97201.(503) 494-4352

dawsonda{at}ohsu.edu

Some studies of CFTR imply that channel activation can be explained by an increase in open probability (P_o), whereas others suggest that activation involves an increase in the number of CFTR channels (N) in the plasma membrane. Using two-electrode voltage clamp, we tested for changes in N associated with activation of CFTR in Xenopus oocytes using a cysteine-substituted construct (R334C CFTR) that can be modified by externally applied, impermeant thiol reagents like [2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl] methanethiosulfonate bromide (MTSET⁺). Covalent modification of R334C CFTR with MTSET⁺ doubled the conductance and changed the I-V relation from inward rectifying to linear and was completely reversed by 2-mercaptoethanol (2-ME). Thus, labeled and unlabeled channels could be differentiated by noting the percent decrease in conductance brought about by exposure to 2-ME. When oocytes were briefly (20 s) exposed to MTSET⁺ before CFTR activation, the subsequently activated conductance was characteristic of labeled R334C CFTR, indicating that the entire pool of CFTR channels activated by cAMP was accessible to MTSET⁺. The addition of unlabeled, newly synthesized channels to the plasma membrane could be monitored on-line during the time when the rate of addition was most rapid after cRNA injection. The addition of new channels could be detected as early as 5 h after cRNA injection, occurred with a half time of 24–48 h, and was disrupted by exposing oocytes to Brefeldin A, whereas activation of R334C CFTR by cAMP occurred with a half time of tens of minutes, and did not appear to involve the addition of new channels to the plasma membrane. These findings demonstrate that in Xenopus oocytes, the major mechanism of CFTR activation by cAMP is by means of an increase in the open probability of CFTR channels.

Key Words: trafficking • MTS reagents • labeling • mutagenesis • oocyte expression

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. S. Smith, X. Liu, Z.-R. Zhang, F. Sun, T. E. Kriewall, N. A. McCarty, and D. C. Dawson Cftr: Covalent and Noncovalent Modification Suggests a Role for Fixed Charges in Anion Conduction J. Gen. Physiol., October 1, 2001; 118(4): 407 - 432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents