|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Address correspondence to Dr. James Brock, Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, Barker St., Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia. Fax: (61) 2-9382-2723; E-mail: j.brock{at}unsw.edu.au
It was reported recently that action potentials actively invade the sensory nerve terminals of corneal polymodal receptors, whereas corneal cold receptor nerve terminals are passively invaded (Brock, J.A., S. Pianova, and C. Belmonte. 2001. J. Physiol. 533:493–501). The present study investigated whether this functional difference between these two types of receptor was due to an absence of voltage-activated Na+ conductances in cold receptor nerve terminals. To address this question, the study examined the effects of polarizing current on the configuration of nerve terminal impulses recorded extracellularly from single polymodal and cold receptors in guinea-pig cornea isolated in vitro. Polarizing currents were applied through the recording electrode. In both receptor types, hyperpolarizing current (+ve) increased the negative amplitude of nerve terminal impulses. In contrast, depolarizing current (-ve) was without effect on polymodal receptor nerve terminal impulses but increased the positive amplitude of cold receptor nerve terminal impulses. The hyperpolarization-induced increase in the negative amplitude of nerve terminal impulses represents a net increase in inward current. In both types of receptor, this increase in inward current was reduced by local application of low Na+ solution and blocked by lidocaine (10 mM). In addition, tetrodotoxin (1 µM) slowed but did not reduce the hyperpolarization-induced increase in the negative amplitude of polymodal and cold nerve terminal impulses. The depolarization-induced increase in the positive amplitude of cold receptor nerve terminal impulses represents a net increase in outward current. This change was reduced both by lidocaine (10 mM) and the combined application of tetraethylammomium (20 mM) and 4-aminopyridine (1 mM). The interpretation is that both polymodal and cold receptor nerve terminals possess high densities of tetrodotoxin-resistant Na+ channels. This finding suggests that in cold receptors, under normal conditions, the Na+ conductances are rendered inactive because the nerve terminal region is relatively depolarized.
Key Words: action potential • tetrodotoxin • sodium channel • sensory receptor • extracellular recording
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. De Col, K. Messlinger, and R. W. Carr Conduction velocity is regulated by sodium channel inactivation in unmyelinated axons innervating the rat cranial meninges J. Physiol., February 15, 2008; 586(4): 1089 - 1103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. Pinto, V. A. Derkach, and B. V. Safronov Role of TTX-Sensitive and TTX-Resistant Sodium Channels in A{delta}- and C-Fiber Conduction and Synaptic Transmission J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 617 - 628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Ekberg, A. Jayamanne, C. W. Vaughan, S. Aslan, L. Thomas, J. Mould, R. Drinkwater, M. D. Baker, B. Abrahamsen, J. N. Wood, et al. {micro}O-conotoxin MrVIB selectively blocks Nav1.8 sensory neuron specific sodium channels and chronic pain behavior without motor deficits PNAS, November 7, 2006; 103(45): 17030 - 17035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Brock, M. C. Acosta, A. Al Abed, S. Pianova, and C. Belmonte Barium ions inhibit the dynamic response of guinea-pig corneal cold receptors to heating but not to cooling J. Physiol., September 1, 2006; 575(2): 573 - 581. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. D Baker Protein kinase C mediates up-regulation of tetrodotoxin-resistant, persistent Na+ current in rat and mouse sensory neurones J. Physiol., September 15, 2005; 567(3): 851 - 867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. K. Sauer, C. Weidner, R. W. Carr, B. Averbeck, U. Nesnidal, P. W. Reeh, and H. O. Handwerker Can Receptor Potentials Be Detected With Threshold Tracking in Rat Cutaneous Nociceptive Terminals? J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2005; 94(1): 219 - 225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. W. Carr, S. Pianova, J. Fernandez, J. B. Fallon, C. Belmonte, and J. A. Brock Effects of Heating and Cooling on Nerve Terminal Impulses Recorded from Cold-sensitive Receptors in the Guinea-pig Cornea J. Gen. Physiol., April 28, 2003; 121(5): 427 - 439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
