|
||
Address correspondence to Dr. King-Wai Yau, Room 907, Preclinical Teaching Building, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 725 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205. Fax: (410) 614-3579; E-mail: KYAU1{at}jhem.jhmi.edu
We have measured the sensitivity of rod photoreceptors from overnight-darkadapted Xenopus laevis through developmental stages 4666 into adulthood by using suction-pipette recording. The dark current increased gradually from
5 pA at stage 46 to
20 pA at stage 57, compared with an adult (metamorphosed) current of
35 pA. This increase in dark current largely paralleled the progressive increase in length and diameter of the rod outer segment (ROS). Throughout stages 4666, the dark current increased approximately linearly with ROS surface area. At stage 53, there was a steep (
10-fold) increase in the rod flash sensitivity, accompanied by a steep increase in the time-to-peak of the half-saturated flash response. This covariance of sensitivity and time-to-peak suggested a change in the state of adaptation of rods at stage 53 and thereafter. When the isolated retina was preincubated with 11-cis-retinal, the flash sensitivity and the response time-to-peak of rods before stage 53 became similar to those at or after stage 53, suggesting that the presence of free opsin (i.e., visual pigment without chromophore) in rods before stage 53 was responsible for the adapted state (low sensitivity and short time-to-peak). By comparing the response sensitivity before stage 53 to the sensitivity at/after stage 53 measured from rods that had been subjected to various known bleaches, we estimated that 2228% of rod opsin in stage 5052 tadpoles (i.e., before stage 53) was devoid of chromophore despite overnight dark-adaptation. When continuously dark adapted for 7 d or longer, however, even tadpoles before stage 53 yielded rods with similar flash sensitivity and response time-to-peak as those of later-stage animals. In conclusion, it appears that chromophore regeneration is very slow in tadpoles before stage 53, but this regeneration becomes much more efficient at stage 53. A similar delay in the maturity of chromophore regeneration may partially underlie the low sensitivity of rods observed in newborn mammals, including human infants.
Key Words: retinaldehyde rat vision
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Q. He, D. Alexeev, M. E. Estevez, S. L. McCabe, P. D. Calvert, D. E. Ong, M. C. Cornwall, A. L. Zimmerman, and C. L. Makino Cyclic Nucleotide-gated Ion Channels in Rod Photoreceptors Are Protected from Retinoid Inhibition J. Gen. Physiol., October 1, 2006; 128(4): 473 - 485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.-G. Luo and K.-W. Yau Rod Sensitivity of Neonatal Mouse and Rat J. Gen. Physiol., August 29, 2005; 126(3): 263 - 269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Solessio, S. S. Mani, N. Cuenca, G. A. Engbretson, R. B. Barlow, and B. E. Knox Developmental regulation of calcium-dependent feedback in Xenopus rods J. Gen. Physiol., October 25, 2004; 124(5): 569 - 585. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
|