Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF, 754K) PPT slides of all figures Supplemental Material Index Alert me when this article is cited Citation Map Services Email this article Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new content in the JGP Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sweet, T.-B. Articles by Cox, D. H. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Sweet, T.-B. Articles by Cox, D. H. Related Collections Related Article Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Molecular Cardiology Research Institute, Tufts Medical Center, and The Department of Neuroscience, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111

Correspondence to Daniel H. Cox: dan.cox{at}tufts.edu

It has been established that the large conductance Ca²⁺-activated K⁺ channel contains two types of high-affinity Ca²⁺ binding sites, termed the Ca²⁺ bowl and the RCK1 site. The affinities of these sites, and how they change as the channel opens, is still a subject of some debate. Previous estimates of these affinities have relied on fitting a series of conductance–voltage relations determined over a series of Ca²⁺ concentrations with models of channel gating that include both voltage sensing and Ca²⁺ binding. This approach requires that some model of voltage sensing be chosen, and differences in the choice of voltage-sensing model may underlie the different estimates that have been produced. Here, to better determine these affinities we have measured Ca²⁺ dose–response curves of channel activity at constant voltage for the wild-type mSlo channel (minus its low-affinity Ca²⁺ binding site) and for channels that have had one or the other Ca²⁺ binding site disabled via mutation. To accurately determine these dose–response curves we have used a series of 22 Ca²⁺ concentrations, and we have used unitary current recordings, coupled with changes in channel expression level, to measure open probability over five orders of magnitude. Our results indicate that at –80 mV the Ca²⁺ bowl has higher affinity for Ca²⁺ than does the RCK1 site in both the opened and closed conformations of the channel, and that the binding of Ca²⁺ to the RCK1 site is voltage dependent, whereas at the Ca²⁺ bowl it is not.

© 2008 Sweet and Cox This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.jgp.org/misc/terms.shtml). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/).

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

Return of the Electric Binding Site

Brad S. Rothberg
J. Gen. Physiol. 2008 132: 487-489. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Highlights From The Literature Physiology, February 1, 2009; 24(1): 4 - 7. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T.-B. Sweet and D. H. Cox Measuring the Influence of the BKCa {beta}1 Subunit on Ca2+ Binding to the BKCa Channel J. Gen. Physiol., February 1, 2009; 133(2): 139 - 150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents