The Journal of General Physiology
CrossRef
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 437K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JGP
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blair, H. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Blair, H. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
The Journal of General Physiology, Vol 20, 787-795, Copyright © 1937 by The Rockefeller University Press


ARTICLE

THE APPARENT DISTORTION OF BRIEF RECTANGULAR ELECTRICAL STIMULI IN NERVE

H. A. Blair 1

1 From the Department of Physiology, The University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, N. Y.

If it is assumed that the kinetics of the process of excitation in nerve is given by dp/dt = KI – kp, I being the actual exciting component of the current, p the state of excitation, and K and k constants, it is necessary to postulate that on application of a rectangular stimulus of voltage, V, the current, I, undergoes a transient exponential variation, usually a decrease, in order that the integral of the differential equation (above) may fit the strength-duration data in V and t. This hypothesis is substantiated by data by Sakamoto on single fibers of the sciatic nerve of the frog. The time constant of the postulated current transient is of the order of 10–4 sec. for single fibers and of the order of 10–5 sec. or less in the sciatic nerve trunk. The latter value is about the same as that found by Cole in the same tissue by purely physical measurements. Some criticisms by Rushton (1934) are discussed.

Accepted on January 2, 1937


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents