The Journal of General Physiology
Cell MicroControls
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 745K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JGP
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Pickels, E. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Smith, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Pickels, E. G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
The Journal of General Physiology, Vol 24, 753-764, Copyright © 1941 by The Rockefeller University Press

ARTICLE

THE EFFECT OF DETERGENTS ON THE CHLOROPHYLL-PROTEIN COMPOUND OF SPINACH AS STUDIED IN THE ULTRACENTRIFUGE

Emil L. Smith 1 and Edward G. Pickels 1

1 From the Laboratory of Biophysics, Columbia University, and the Laboratories of the International Health Division of The Rockefeller Foundation, New York

1. The chlorophyll-protein compound of the spinach leaf has been studied in the air-driven ultracentrifuge using the Svedberg light-absorption method, and a direct-reading refractive index method.

2. When the untreated extracts are centrifuged at low speeds, the green protein sediments with a purely random spread of particle sizes confirming the fact that the protein is not in true solution.

3. In the presence of digitonin, bile salts, and sodium desoxycholate, the extracts are clarified. These detergents split the chlorophyll from the protein and the protein itself shows a sedimentation constant of 13.5 x 10–13 equivalent to a molecular weight of at least 265,000 as calculated from Stokes' law. This probably represents the minimum size of the protein in native form.

4. Sodium dodecyl sulfate, a detergent which also clarifies the leaf extracts, shows a different behavior. The prosthetic group remains attached to the protein but the protein is split into smaller units. In 0.25 per cent SDS, S20 is 2.6 x 10–13 over a pH range of 5 to 9, although at the acid pH chlorophyll is converted to phaeophytin. In 2.5 per cent SDS, S20 is 1.7 x 10–13 suggesting a further splitting of the protein.

5. No differences in behavior were found for the various chloroplast pigments.

 Submitted on March 13, 1941


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ScienceHome page
D. J. Haidak, C. K. Mathews, and B. M. Sweeney
Pigment Protein Complex from Gonyaulax
Science, April 8, 1966; 152(3719): 212 - 213.
[Abstract] [PDF]


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents