The Journal of General Physiology
Scientifica: Experts in Electrophysiology
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 997K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JGP
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sakamoto, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sakamoto, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
The Journal of General Physiology, Vol 54, 765-781, Copyright © 1969 by The Rockefeller University Press


ARTICLE

Membrane Characteristics of the Canine Papillary Muscle Fiber

Yasuzi Sakamoto 1

1 From the Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

Passive and active responses to intracellular and extracellular stimulation were studied in the canine papillary muscle. The electrotonic potential produced by extracellular polarization with the partition chamber method fitted the time course and the spatial decay expected from the cable theory (the time constant, 3.3 msec; the space constant, 1.2 mm). Contrariwise, spatial decay of the electrotonic potentials produced by intracellular polarization was very short and did not fit the decay curve expected for a simple cable, although only a small difference of time course in the electrotonic potentials produced by intracellular and extracellular polarizations was observed. A similar time course might result from the fact that when current flow results from intracellular polarization, the input resistance is less dependent on the membrane resistance. The foot of the propagated action potential rose exponentially with a time constant of 1.1 msec and a conduction velocity of 0.68 m/sec. The membrane capacity was calculated from the time constant of the foot potential and the conduction velocity to be 0.76 µF/cm2. The responses of the papillary muscle membrane to intracellular stimulation differed from those to extracellular stimulation applied with the partition method in the following ways: higher threshold potential, shorter latency for the active response, linearity of the current-voltage relationship, and no reduction in the membrane resistance at the crest of the action potential during current flow.

Submitted on May 22, 1969


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Gotoh, T. Uchida, W. J. Mandel, M. C. Fishbein, P.-S. Chen, and H. S. Karagueuzian
Cellular Graded Responses and Ventricular Vulnerability to Reentry by a Premature Stimulus in Isolated Canine Ventricle
Circulation, April 15, 1997; 95(8): 2141 - 2154.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents