The Journal of General Physiology
Cell MicroControls
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1151K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JGP
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eisenberg, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Engel, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eisenberg, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Engel, E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
The Journal of General Physiology, Vol 55, 736-757, Copyright © 1970 by The Rockefeller University Press

ARTICLE

The Spatial Variation of Membrane Potential Near a Small Source of Current in a Spherical Cell

R. S. Eisenberg 1 and E. Engel 1

1 From the Department of Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90024

A theoretical analysis is presented of the change in membrane potential produced by current supplied by a microelectrode inserted just under the membrane of a spherical cell. The results of the analysis are presented in tabular and graphic form for three wave forms of current: steady, step function, and sinusoidal. As expected from physical reasoning, we find that the membrane potential is nonuniform, that there is a steep rise in membrane potential near the current microelectrode, and that this rise is of particular importance when the membrane resistance is low, or the membrane potential is changing rapidly. The effect of this steep rise in potential on the interpretation of voltage measurements from spherical cells is discussed and practical suggestions for minimizing these effects are made: in particular, it is pointed out that if the current and voltage electrodes are separated by 60°, the change in membrane potential produced by application of current is close to that which would occur if there were no spatial variation of potential. We thus suggest that investigations of the electrical properties of spherical cells using two microelectrodes can best be made when the electrodes are separated by 60°.

Submitted on November 3, 1969


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Biol. Reprod.Home page
R. O. Arellano, A. Martinez-Torres, and E. Garay
Ionic Currents Activated via Purinergic Receptors in the Cumulus Cell-Enclosed Mouse Oocyte
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2002; 67(3): 837 - 846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Exp BotHome page
M.R.G. Roelfsema, R. Steinmeyer, and R. Hedrich
Discontinuous single electrode voltage-clamp measurements: assessment of clamp accuracy in Vicia faba guard cells
J. Exp. Bot., September 1, 2001; 52(362): 1933 - 1939.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. G. Klemic, D. M. Durand, and S. W. Jones
Activation Kinetics of the Delayed Rectifier Potassium Current of Bullfrog Sympathetic Neurons
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 1998; 79(5): 2345 - 2357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents