The Journal of General Physiology
CrossRef
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 643K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JGP
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Uchitel, O. D.
Right arrow Articles by García, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Uchitel, O. D.
Right arrow Articles by García, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
The Journal of General Physiology, Vol 63, 111-122, Copyright © 1974 by The Rockefeller University Press


ARTICLE

Muscle Contraction during Hyperpolarizing Currents in the Crab

O. D. Uchitel 1 and H. García 1

1 From the Centro de Investigaciones Neurológicas, Instituto Torcuato Di Tella, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Dr. Uchitel's present address is the Institute de Anatomía General y Embriología, Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Isolated muscle fibers from the motor legs of the crab Trichodactilus dilocarcinus were submitted to strong hyperpolarizing currents of varied intensities which produced tension during the current pulse. Threshold for tension was obtained with intensities of about 0.2 x 10–5 A, changing Em to ca. –150 mV (starting from a resting potential ofca. –80 mV). At the closure of the anodic square pulse, a second phase of tension usually appeared superimposed upon the one obtained during hyperpolarization. The first phase of tension increased with the increase of Ca++ concentration in the bath. Sr++ produced the same type of mechanical output as Ca++. When added to the normal Ca++ concentration, Ba++ and Mn++ in low concentrations (up to 21.5 mM) also increased the tension of this phase, but at higher concentrations they blocked both phases while Mg++ did not alter the tension. Of all the divalent cations employed, only Sr++ is capable of developing tension as a substitute for Ca++ in the external media. Procaine administered in a dosage (5 x 10–3 W/V)which would suppress the contracture due to caffeine (10 mM), did not modify the tension developed during the hyperpolarization.

The preceding data indicate that the Ca++ required for tension during hyperpolarization comes from sites which would differ from those usually postulated for tension due to depolarization in the muscle fibers of other crustaceans (American crayfish). Furthermore, the external source of Ca++ appears to be one mainly implicated in the induction of tension due to inward current pulses.

Submitted on February 27, 1973


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents