The Journal of General Physiology
Cell MicroControls
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1547K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JGP
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gurney, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lester, H. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gurney, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lester, H. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Journal of General Physiology, Vol 86, 353-379, Copyright © 1985 by The Rockefeller University Press


ARTICLES

Photoinduced removal of nifedipine reveals mechanisms of calcium antagonist action on single heart cells

AM Gurney, JM Nerbonne and HA Lester

The currents through voltage-activated calcium channels in heart cell membranes are suppressed by dihydropyridine calcium antagonists such as nifedipine. Nifedipine is photolabile, and the reduction of current amplitude by this drug can be reversed within a few milliseconds after a 1-ms light flash. The blockade by nifedipine and its removal by flashes were studied in isolated myocytes from neonatal rat heart using the whole-cell clamp method. The results suggest that nifedipine interacts with closed, open, and inactivated calcium channels. It is likely that at the normal resting potential of cardiac cells, the suppression of current amplitude arises because nifedipine binds to and stabilizes channels in the resting, closed state. Inhibition is enhanced at depolarized membrane potentials, where interaction with inactivated channels may also become important. Additional block of open channels is suggested when currents are carried by Ba2+ but is not indicated with Ca2+ currents. Numerical simulations reproduce the experimental observations with molecular dissociation constants on the order of 10(-7) M for closed and open channels and 10(-8) M for inactivated channels.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
B. Z. Peterson and W. A. Catterall
Allosteric Interactions Required for High-Affinity Binding of Dihydropyridine Antagonists to CaV1.1 Channels Are Modulated by Calcium in the Pore
Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2006; 70(2): 667 - 675.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
R. Handrock, R. Rao-Schymanski, N. Klugbauer, F. Hofmann, and S. Herzig
Dihydropyridine enantiomers block recombinant L-type Ca2+ channels by two different mechanisms
J. Physiol., November 15, 1999; 521(1): 31 - 42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents