The Journal of General Physiology
CrossRef
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 723K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JGP
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith-Maxwell, C.
Right arrow Articles by Begenisich, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith-Maxwell, C.
Right arrow Articles by Begenisich, T.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Journal of General Physiology, Vol 90, 361-374, Copyright © 1987 by The Rockefeller University Press

ARTICLES

Guanidinium analogues as probes of the squid axon sodium pore. Evidence for internal surface charges

C Smith-Maxwell and T Begenisich
Department of Physiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, New York 14642.

We have investigated the reduction of steady state sodium channel currents by a monovalent and a divalent guanidinium analogue. The amount of block by the divalent compound at a constant membrane potential was dramatically reduced by an increase in the internal salt concentration. Channel block by the monovalent molecule was a less steep function of salt concentration. These results would be expected if there were negative charges near the sodium pore that produced a local accumulation of the cationic blocking ions. According to this view, the ionic strength dependence of block results from changes in surface potential. The divalent blocker would be expected to be more sensitive to ionic strength owing to its larger valence. Our results can be quantitatively described by a simple ionic double-layer model with an effective surface charge density of about -1 e/250 A2 in the vicinity of the pore.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents