The Journal of General Physiology
Cell MicroControls
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 795K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JGP
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kujiraoka, T.
Right arrow Articles by Toyoda, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kujiraoka, T.
Right arrow Articles by Toyoda, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of General Physiology, Vol 92, 475-487, Copyright © 1988 by The Rockefeller University Press


ARTICLES

Analysis of synaptic inputs to on-off amacrine cells of the carp retina

T Kujiraoka, T Saito and J Toyoda
Department of Physiology, St. Marianna University, School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.

To elucidate the synaptic transmission between bipolar cells and amacrine cells, the effect of polarization of a bipolar cell on an amacrine cell was examined by simultaneous intracellular recordings from both cells in the isolated carp retina. When either an ON or OFF bipolar cell was depolarized by an extrinsic current step, an ON-OFF amacrine cell was transiently depolarized at the onset of the current but no sustained polarization during the current was detected. The current hyperpolarizing the OFF bipolar cell also produced the transient depolarization of the amacrine cell at the termination of the current. These responses had a latency of approximately 10 ms. The amplitude of the current-evoked responses changed gradually with current intensity within the range used in these experiments. They were affected by polarization of the amacrine cell membrane; the amplitude of the current-evoked responses as well as the light-evoked responses was increased when the amacrine cell membrane was hyperpolarized, while the amplitude was decreased when the cell was depolarized. These results confirm directly that ON-OFF amacrine cells receive excitatory inputs from both ON and OFF bipolar cells: the ON transient is due to inputs from ON bipolar cells, and the OFF transient to inputs from OFF bipolar cells. The steady polarization of bipolar cells is converted into transient signals during the synaptic process.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JGPHome page
K. Djupsund, T. Furukawa, S. Yasui, and M. Yamada
Asymmetric Temporal Properties in the Receptive Field of Retinal Transient Amacrine Cells
J. Gen. Physiol., September 29, 2003; 122(4): 445 - 458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. L. Passaglia, C. Enroth-Cugell, and J. B. Troy
Effects of Remote Stimulation on the Mean Firing Rate of Cat Retinal Ganglion Cells
J. Neurosci., August 1, 2001; 21(15): 5794 - 5803.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S.-I. Watanabe, A. Koizumi, S. Matsunaga, J. W. Stocker, and A. Kaneko
GABA-Mediated Inhibition Between Amacrine Cells in the Goldfish Retina
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2000; 84(4): 1826 - 1834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H. von Gersdorff and G. Matthews
Depletion and Replenishment of Vesicle Pools at a Ribbon-Type Synaptic Terminal
J. Neurosci., March 15, 1997; 17(6): 1919 - 1927.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents