|
||
Article |


,||||
,||||
Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee 37232; and
Howard Hughes Medical Institute and |||| Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa 52242
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: chloride channel skeletal muscle myotonia subunit stoichiometry electrophysiology
| introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several lines of evidence suggest that the functional ClC channel unit is composed of multiple identical components. Based upon detailed analyses of single Torpedo electroplax Cl– channels reconstituted into planar lipid bilayers, Miller and colleagues proposed the "double-barreled shotgun" model to explain the occurrence of two equally spaced and independently gated subconductance states (Miller, 1982
; Hanke and Miller, 1983
; Miller and White, 1984
). In this model the Torpedo channel consists of two identical ion conduction pathways or protochannels which are gated simultaneously by a common slow gate, but each protochannel is gated independently by a faster process. Examination of single channel recordings of cloned Torpedo Cl– channels (ClC-0) expressed in Xenopus oocytes show that these distinct gating and conduction properties are completely reconstituted in a heterologous system indicating that a single cDNA is sufficient to code for this channel behavior (Bauer et al., 1991
). These functional attributes of ClC-0 do not provide direct structural information about the subunit composition of the channel. However, a recent biochemical study of purified Torpedo Cl– channels demonstrated that the native configuration of the protein has the sedimentation properties of a homodimer (Middleton et al., 1994
).
Although it is natural to expect that all ClC channels will have similar multimeric structures, there is evidence in conflict with the biochemical data on ClC-0 that points toward tetrameric assembly of the skeletal muscle channel, ClC-1. This information has emerged from the functional characterization of naturally occurring mutations in a dominant form of congenital myotonia (Thomsen's disease). In this work, co-expression experiments in Xenopus oocytes revealed that two disease-producing mutants (G230E, P480L) exert negative effects on the functional expression of the wild-type human skeletal muscle Cl– channel (hClC-1) (Steinmeyer et al., 1994
). Based upon RNA titration experiments in which wild-type and mutant transcripts were co-expressed in oocytes, Steinmeyer and colleagues proposed that functional channels are composed of four identical subunits.
The subunit stoichiometry of Shaker and related mammalian potassium channels has been ascertained in part by the analysis of artificial multimeric channels in which subunits have been covalently linked together (Isacoff et al., 1990
; Liman et al., 1992
). This novel and informative approach requires the "tagging" of at least one subunit with a mutation that alters a specific functional property such as inactivation or toxin block. Such a strategy can now be applied to the determination of subunit stoichiometry of the human skeletal muscle Cl– channel (hClC-1) by assembling multimeric constructs incorporating a mutation, D136G, that causes a profound disturbance in voltage-dependent gating (Fahlke et al., 1995
). The distinct gating properties of wild-type (WT)1 and mutant hClC-1 provide the necessary "tags" to allow recognition of heteromulti-meric channels and to quantify the probable number of subunits required to form a functional channel. In this paper, we report the successful application of this method for examining the subunit stoichiometry of hClC-1, and find strong evidence that the channel is a functional dimer.
| methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The WT–WT hClC-1 dimer construct was assembled in the mammalian expression vector pRc/CMV by ligating together the following restriction fragments: WT pRc/CMV-hClC-1, HindIII/ BspHI (containing 76 bp of vector polylinker and nt 1–1395 of hClC-1); hClC-1-DT, BspHI/EagI (nt 1396–2965, linker); WT– hClC-1, NotI/XbaI (nt 1–2999); and pRc/CMV, HindIII/XbaI. Recombinants were screened by PstI digestion, and correct constructs were identified by the presence of a unique 780–bp fragment as well as the appearance of double intensity ethidium bromide–stained fragments derived from the duplicated cDNA sequence. The D136G -D136G dimer construct was assembled in a similar manner except that the HindIII/BspHI and NotI/XbaI fragments were derived from D136G (Fahlke et al., 1995
). The presence of the mutant sequence and the absence of WT sequence in the final D136G -D136G construct was verified by Southern blot hybridization of PstI digested plasmid DNA using allele-specific oligonucleotide probes. The WT–D136G construct was made by substituting only the NotI/XbaI fragment with the corresponding segment from D136G. Similarly, the D136G –WT construct was made by substituting the HindIII/BspHI fragment with the corresponding segment from D136G. Final constructs were shown to have both WT and D136G sequences in appropriate regions using allele-specific hybridizations.
Cell Lines and Transient Transfections
HEK-293 cells (ATCC CRL 1573; American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD) stably transfected with pRc/CMV-hClC-1 and pRc/CMV-WT–WT were produced as previously described (Fahlke et al., 1995
). Transient transfection of tsA201 (HEK-293 cells stably transformed with the SV40 large T antigen) was performed as described by Chahine et al. (1994)
using 10–15 µg of plasmid DNA and 10–100 µg of salmon sperm DNA as carrier (Chahine et al., 1994
). Transfection efficiencies ranged from 20 to 80% as judged by the proportion of cells expressing Cl– currents. For cotransfection experiments, 10 µg of each WT or WT–WT and D136G or D136G –D136G plasmids were used without carrier DNA. Typically 48 h after transfection, cells were split into 35-mm culture dishes and investigated at least 3 h later. Cells in which current amplitude exceeded 10 nA were excluded from analysis.
Electrophysiology
Standard whole-cell recording (Hamill et al., 1981
) was performed using an Axopatch 200A amplifier (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA). Pipettes were pulled from borosilicate glass and had resistances of 0.5–0.9 M
. More than 80% of the series resistance was compensated by an analog procedure. The calculated voltage error due to series resistance was always <5 mV. No digital leakage and capacitive current subtraction were used. Currents were filtered with an internal 4-pole Bessel filter with 1, 2, or 5 kHz (–3 dB) and digitized with sampling rates which are at least five times the filter frequency using a Digidata AD/DA converter (Axon Instruments). Cells were clamped to 0 mV for at least 15 s between test sweeps.
The bath solution contained (in mM) 140 NaCl, 4 KCl, 2 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, and 5 HEPES; the pipette solution contained (in mM) 130 CsCl, 2 MgCl2, 5 EGTA, and 10 HEPES. All solutions were adjusted to a pH of 7.4 with CsOH (pipette solutions) or NaOH (bath solutions).
Data Analysis
Data were analyzed by a combination of pClamp (Axon Instruments) and SigmaPlot (Jandel Scientific, San Rafael, CA) programs. All data are shown as means ± SD.
The time course of current activation was fit with an equation containing either one exponential or a sum of two exponentials and a time-independent value (d) as follows: I(t) = a1exp(–t/
1) [+ a2exp(–t/
2)] + d. Activation was analyzed for potentials < 0 mV only. Instantaneous current amplitudes were measured 100 µs after the voltage step. To construct activation curves as shown in Figs. 6 and 7, the instantaneous current amplitude (normalized to its maximum value at a fixed potential of –105 mV) measured after 750 ms prepulses to different voltages (V) was plotted vs. the preceding potential as described previously (Fahlke et al., 1995
; Fahlke et al., 1996
). This plot yields the voltage dependence of the relative open probability, Popen at the end of the 750-ms pulses. The activation curves obtained in this manner were fit with a single Boltzmann and a voltage-independent value: I(V ) = Amp · [1 + exp([V – V0.5]/kV)]–1 + constant.
|
|
|
|
Expression was examined by a two-electrode voltage clamp using a Warner Instrument Corp. (Hamden, CT) oocyte clamp 7C-725B amplifier. As previously described, WT and D136G hClC-1 channels share a high affinity for 9-anthracene carboxylic acid (9-AC) (Fahlke et al., 1995
). To correct for leakage and endogenous currents conducted by channels other than hClC-1, oocytes were perfused with ND 96 + 0.2 mM 9-AC after each recording. The blocking process was monitored by repetitive pulses from a holding potential of –30 to –125 mV (0.1 Hz). After reaching steady-state levels, the same pulse protocols were performed, and the current amplitudes recorded under these conditions were subtracted from the original recording. Only subtracted recordings were used for analysis. For the calculation of Iss/Ipeak, the peak current (Ipeak) was measured immediately after settling of the capacitive transient, and the steady-state current (Iss) was measured at the end of the test pulse (Fig. 8).
|
Protein samples were fractionated by SDS-PAGE electrophoresis on precast 4–15% polyacrylamide gradient gels (Bio-Rad Corp.) and electro-transferred to Immobilon PVDF membranes (Millipore Corp., Bedford MA) at 50 V for 18 h at 4°C. After transfer, membranes were placed in a blocking solution consisting of 5% nonfat dry milk in TBS-T (50 mM Tris base, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween-20, pH 7.5) overnight at 4°C, washed twice with TBS -T, and probed for 2 h at 25°C with a 1:100 dilution of an affinity-purified rabbit polyclonal antibody directed against the carboxyl-terminus of ClC-1 (Gurnett et al., 1995
). The membrane was washed twice with TBS-T and incubated for 1 h at 25°C with a 1:10,000 dilution of goat anti–rabbit IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO). After several washes in TBS-T, immunoreactive proteins were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL; Amersham Corp., Arlington Heights, IL).
Sucrose Density Gradient Centrifugation
Plasma membrane protein (250–400 µg) from HEK 293 cells stably transfected with hClC-1 monomer or WT–WT dimer were solubilized in SB buffer (1% Triton X-100, 50 mM Tris, 12.5 mM MgCl2, 1.5 mM EGTA, 150 mM NaCl, 1.0 mM PMSF, 3.0 mM benzamidine, 1.0 mM N-ethylmaleimide, pH 7.5) for 1 h at 4 Arlington Heights, ILC. The samples were centrifuged in a Beckman 70.1 ti rotor (Beckman Instruments, Inc., Fullerton, CA) at 100,000 g for 1 h at 4°C. The hClC-1 supernatants and standard proteins were loaded on separate, continuous 7.5–20% sucrose gradients prepared with SB buffer containing 0.1% Triton X-100, then centrifuged in a Beckman SW 40 ti rotor at 100,000 g for 16 h at 4°C. Individual gradients were fractionated bottom-to-top by dropwise collection into 32 tubes (8 drops,
370 µl). Aliquots (24 µl) were fractionated on 4–15% gradients SDS-PAGE gels and were analyzed either by silver staining (protein standards) or Western blotting (WT, WT–WT) as described above.
| results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Fig. 1 shows the results of whole-cell current recordings made in cells transfected with either monomeric (WT, D136G) or homodimeric (WT–WT, D136G – D136G) cDNA constructs. Cells expressing either WT or WT–WT exhibit rapid deactivation elicited with hyperpolarizing voltage steps from a holding potential of 0 mV that is characteristic of this channel (Steinmeyer et al., 1991
; Pusch et al., 1994
; Fahlke et al., 1996
). Expression of D136G and D136G –D136G constructs resulted in currents which exhibit slow activation upon hyperpolarization as previously described (Fahlke et al., 1995
). Current-voltage relationships and steady-state activation curves were identical between corresponding monomeric and dimeric channels (data not shown). These results indicate that the functional phenotypes of both WT and D136G are preserved in the homodimeric constructs, and that the artificial peptide linker has no effect on channel function.
Biochemical Characterization of hClC-1 Dimers
To verify that our tandem constructs did indeed encode dimeric proteins, we performed Western blot analyses on cells transfected with either WT, or one of the dimeric constructs (Fig. 2 A). Cells transfected with the monomeric WT channel express a single
120–130 kD protein detectable by using an anti–ClC-1 antibody (Gurnett et al., 1995
). Cells transfected with WT–WT, D136G –D136G, and WT–D136G (see below) all express a single protein having a molecular mass of
240 kD indicating that our cDNA constructs encode dimeric proteins.
|
Expression of Heterodimeric WT–D136G Channels
We combined WT and D136G together in a single reading frame as a tool to explore the functional subunit stoichiometry of hClC-1. Cells transiently transfected with the WT–D136G construct expressed large Cl– currents and synthesize a protein of molecular mass appropriate for an hClC-1 dimer (Fig. 2 A). Fig. 3 A shows representative whole-cell recordings made from cells transfected with WT–D136G. In contrast to D136G but similar to WT channels, WT–D136G cells express currents exhibiting rapid deactivation upon hyperpolarization. However, WT–D136G currents deactivate to an extent much less than WT channels. In WT–D136G -expressing cells, current measured 300 ms after onset of a –165 mV voltage-step ("steady-state" current) is approximately fivefold larger than it is for WT; the fractional steady-state currents were 0.47 and 0.1 for WT–D136G and WT, respectively. At –165 mV, WT–D136G currents also exhibit a very small (<5% of peak current) slowly activating component which is never seen in WT channels. The voltage dependence of the instantaneous as well as that of the current amplitude at the end of the test pulse displays inward rectification (data not shown). Thus, expression of WT–D136G gives rise to Cl– currents with gating properties distinct from either WT or D136G. We also considered that subunit order could be a factor in the genesis of the novel gating phenotype observed in WT–D136G expressing cells as was found in studies of tandem voltage-gated K+ channels (McCormack et al., 1992
), and therefore constructed a heterotandem construct with the reversed order of subunits (designated as D136G –WT). In cells transiently transfected with D136G –WT, we observed an identical gating phenotype as seen in WT–D136G expressing cells (Fig. 3 B).
To evaluate whether the current recordings made in WT–D136G expressing cells could result from a simple superimposition of the individual current components of WT and D136G, we compared these data with simulations of currents that would result from the addition of the two individual channels. The results of this simulation done at two voltages (–165 and –115 mV) were then compared to current recordings of the monomeric and heterodimeric channels. The simulated currents exhibit rapid deactivation followed by a large slowly activating component. In a qualitative manner, actual WT–D136G current recordings are obviously distinct from the simple sum of the two separate channels (Fig. 3, C and D). These data indicate that channels encoded by WT–D136G and D136G –WT are gated by a mechanism resulting from an interaction between the two covalently coupled subunits and are consistent with the formation of heteromultimeric channels. Furthermore, this subunit–subunit interaction is independent of the subunit order.
A quantitative analysis of the gating properties of Cl– currents in WT–D136G transfected cells reveal that there is a homogenous population of channels present. Evidence for channel homogeneity comes from studies of the time course of activation. The time course of current activation elicited by depolarizing test potentials following a prepotential of –100 mV is shown for WT– D136G (Fig. 4 A), WT channels (Fig. 4 B), and D136G (Fig. 4 C). The time course for WT–D136G activation is well fit by a single exponential function, whereas WT channel activation is biexponential and consists of fast and slow components. The activation time constants for WT–D136G and WT are not voltage-dependent in the negative potential range, and the mean value of the activation time constant for WT–D136G (
= 7.7 ± 1.4 ms, n = 4) is not statistically different from the fast activation time constant for WT channels (
fast = 7.4 ± 1.1 ms, n = 4). The absence of a second exponential component in WT–D136G activation indicates that the contribution of homomultimeric WT channels (and by inference, homomultimeric D136G channels) is negligible. Homogeneity of the expressed current phenotype suggests that functional channel complexes are formed by an even number of subunits. If the channel complex were formed by an odd number of subunits, we would expect a mixed current phenotype because of unequal incorporations of mutant and WT subunits. These data also imply that a single mechanism simultaneously gates the ion pore or pores of hClC-1, although it is not possible to know the exact pore stoichiometry from our results. Based upon our results from the heterotandem expression experiments, we conclude that a cooperative interaction between an even number of at least two subunits is required to form functional hClC-1 channels.
|
|
We exploited the distinct gating properties of WT, WT–D136G, and D136G as a tool to evaluate the subunit composition of the expressed channels using a more quantitative analysis. This was accomplished by subtracting the "pure" D136G component from the currents observed in co-transfection experiments, and determining if the residual current components resemble the pure WT phenotype or a mixture of WT and heteromultimeric channels. To accomplish this, we examined peak instantaneous and late currents resulting from a test pulse of –105 mV that is preceded by various prepotentials (Fig. 7). This is a similar pulse protocol used in Fig. 1 except our analyses were restricted to the "tail" portion of the records. Fig. 7 illustrates the results obtained from cells expressing WT, WT–D136G, or D136G alone to determine the essential characteristics of each channel with this pulse protocol (Fig. 7, A, C, and E). For both WT and WT–D136G, the current amplitudes measured at the end of the –105 mV test potential (Iss) were the same for all prepotentials (i.e., are voltage independent, Fig. 7, B and D), whereas the D136G currents decrease with more depolarized prepotentials (Fig. 7 F ). Therefore, a decrease of Iss at the end of the –105 mV test potential can be used as a marker of pure D136G current. Furthermore, WT can be distinguished from WT–D136G by the ratio Iss/Ipeak determined at the most negative prepotential (WT: Iss/ Ipeak = 0.11 ± 0.03, n = 5; WT–D136G: Iss/Ipeak = 0.48 ± 0.06, n = 5). Moreover, the voltage dependence of the normalized Ipeak differs greatly between WT and WT– D136G; the voltage dependence of Ipeak can be well fit with a single Boltzmann function for WT alone, but not for WT–D136G.
In Fig. 8, A, B, and C, we show the analysis of a representative cell cotransfected with both WT–WT and D136G –D136G. These data show a clear decrease in Iss (open squares) between –165 and –85 mV. The slope of a straight line fit to the first four data points in Fig. 8 B was divided by the slope of a similar line fit to the data in Fig. 7 F. The ratio of these two slopes was used as a scaling factor to estimate the proportion of steady-state current in Fig. 8 B due to pure D136G channels. This value was obtained by multiplying the normalized current values in Fig. 7 F by the derived scaling factor and then subtracting these values at each prepotential from the data shown in Fig. 8 B. This subtraction gives the normalized current voltage relationship for the residual current component. Inspection of this residual component reveals its close similarity to the WT current-voltage relationship shown in Fig. 8 C, and the dependence of the instantaneous current amplitude on the prepulse potential can be fit with a single Boltzmann function and a constant term. The parameters of this fit in the WT–WT:D136G –D136G cotransfected cell are indistinguishable from values obtained from WT expressing cells (V0.5 = –53.9 ± 7.6 vs. –51.1 ± 5.9 mV for WT, n = 7, P > 0.1; kV = –21.9 ± 4.1 vs. –18.9 ± 0.9 mV for WT, n = 7, P > 0.1). Furthermore, the Iss/Ipeak ratio determined at the most negative prepotential for the residual current component in WT–WT:D136G – D136G cotransfected cells was 0.13 ± 0.09 (n = 9) and is not significantly different from WT channels (0.11 ± 0.03, n = 5). It is therefore unlikely that this residual current has a component due to the formation of heteromultimeric channels. This analysis should be sufficiently sensitive to detect heteromultimeric channel phenotypes in the context of a tetrameric channel assembly. If the channel were a tetramer, then WT, heteromultimer, and D136G phenotypes would exist in proportions consistent with a binomial distribution. Even in the case of threefold lower expression levels of the D136G homodimer, a current component resulting from formation of heterotetramers should represent 37.5% of the total current (calculation based on a standard binomial distribution in which current phenotypes would exist in the ratio of a2:2ab:b2, where a = WT–WT density, b = D136G–D136G density, a2= probability of forming WT homotetramers, b2 = probability of forming D136G homotetramers, 2ab = probability of heterotetramer formation).
This quantitative analysis was able to detect the presence of heteromultimeric channels in an experiment where WT and D136G monomer constructs were cotransfected into tsA201 cells. Fig. 8, D, E, and F, show analysis of a representative WT:D136G co-expressing cell. In this cell, subtraction of pure D136G steady-state current leaves a residual component with an Iss/Ipeak ratio of 0.39. This Iss/Ipeak value is significantly larger than observed for WT alone or what was observed in the homodimer co-expression experiment and is intermediate between values observed for WT and WT–D136G. Furthermore, the voltage dependence of the subtracted Ipeak cannot be fit with a single Boltzmann function consistent with more than one current component. Similar evidence for heteromultimeric channel formation was observed in all cells examined (n = 7). This experiment demonstrates the ability of this method to detect heteromultimeric current components and also helps exclude the possibility that WT and D136G subunits do not co-assemble unless covalently linked.
Co-Expression of WT–D136G and D136G –WT Heterodimers
The absence of a heteromultimeric current component in the co-transfection experiments with WT–WT and D136G –D136G excludes a tetrameric channel assembly with two pores (Fig. 5 B). In considering the various channel architectures shown in Fig. 5, we recognized the remote possibility that subunit arrangement in a single pore tetramer could be a factor in determining the gating phenotype. For example, assembly of one WT–WT dimer with one D136G –D136G dimer into a single pore tetramer having the identical subunits in adjacent positions gives rise to currents indistinguishable from either WT alone, D136G alone, or the linear sum of WT and D136G. However, we can evaluate this possibility by co-expressing WT–D136G with D136G – WT. If the channel is a single pore tetramer, then one would expect formation of two complexes in which the identical subunits are diagonally arranged (similar to the situation with WT–D136G alone) and one complex with the identical subunits in adjacent positions (Fig. 5 C). If the latter complex gives rise to WT, D136G, or summed current phenotypes, then we should observe one of these possibilities in addition to heteromulti-meric channels. To test his idea, we expressed WT– D136G and D136G –WT simultaneously in oocytes and measured current with the two-electrode voltage clamp. Oocytes were used in this experiment to better control the stoichiometry of channel expression. Expression of both WT–D136G and D136G –WT alone or in combination give rise to identical current phenotypes (Fig. 9, A, B, and C), with indistinguishable peak current amplitudes (instantaneous current measured at –145 mV [mean ± SEM, n = 7]: WT–D136G, 5.4 ± 1.0 µA; D136G –WT, 6.7 ± 1.2 µA; WT–D136G + D136G –WT, 6.6 ± 1.7 µA).
|
| discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our data demonstrates that the heterodimeric WT– D136G construct encodes a homogenous population of channels with novel gating properties that cannot be explained by simple addition of the two separate WT and D136G phenotypes (Fig. 3). The functional homogeneity of the WT–D136G channel population is supported by the demonstration of monoexponential time course of current activation (Fig. 4, A and B). These findings are not consistent with the expression of a mixture of homomultimeric and heteromultimeric channels, and therefore rule out the possibility that homodimeric channels are formed in these experiments by misassembly of WT–D136G (channels formed by subunits contributed by more than one WT–D136G molecule). However, these data alone do not rule out that the channel complex is a tetramer.
Our cotransfection experiments using WT–WT and D136G–D136G help to rule out the possibility that the number of subunits per channel is greater than two. This is best appreciated by considering simple possible configurations of the two homodimeric channels as shown in Fig. 5 B. In the case of heterotetramer formation, we would expect three Cl– channel phenotypes (WT, D136G, WT–D136G) to co-exist. What we observed fits best with a simple superimposition of the two WT and D136G current phenotypes (Fig. 7). We cannot completely exclude the possibility that WT–WT and D136G–D136G only interact to form homotetrameric pores or that heterotetramer formation is unstable in this experiment. However, preferential assembly of homomultimeric channels seems very unlikely in view of the highly efficient expression of both heterotandem constructs, and the lack of evidence for homomulti-meric channels in WT–D136G transfected cells. Similarly, trimeric channels resulting from the assembly of one dimer molecule with a single subunit of a separate dimer molecule seems unlikely because of the homogeneity of channel expression with WT–D136G alone, and the absence of heteromultimeric channels in the homodimer co-transfection experiment.
Finally, we have excluded that a tetrameric assembly could be responsible for the expression of summed WT and D136G phenotypes uniquely in the homodimer co-expression experiments due to the adjacent arrangement of the subunits. To do this we examined the heterotandem constructs WT–D136G and D136G –WT together in Xenopus oocytes. This experiment was performed to rule out that adjacent (vs. diagonal) arrangement of hClC-1 subunits in a tetrameric complex might lead to a summed phenotype. As illustrated in Fig. 5 C, co-assembly of the two heterotandem channels will produce diagonal and adjacent complexes in a 2:1 ratio. If the adjacent configuration gives rise to the summed phenotype while the diagonal configurations result in channels that exhibit a mixed gating phenotype resembling WT–D136G alone, we should have observed a more complex gating behavior in cells co-expressing both heterotandems. The absence of such a complex gating phenotype and the identity of these results with those obtained with either heterotandem channel alone rules out cross-talk within the context of a tetrameric channel complex and indicates that only dimeric channels are functional.
In support of a dimeric structure for hClC-1, we have also presented biochemical evidence that the recombinant channel forms native complexes consistent with a two subunit structure. Sucrose density gradient centri-fugation of triton X-100 solubilized membranes from hClC-1 expressing HEK-293 cells indicates that the molecular mass of the native channel (
158–240 kD) is close to twice the predicted mass of a single subunit (
120–130 kD). Furthermore, the sedimentation properties of hClC-1 are the same for proteins encoded by both monomeric and tandem cDNA constructs. Our results indicate a dimeric structure for hClC-1 when it is expressed heterologously. The size of the channel complex in native skeletal muscle should be similar unless additional non-identical subunits or cytoskeletal elements unique to muscle are incorporated.
Our conclusion that hClC-1 is a dimer conflicts with the previously published study by Steinmeyer et al. that infers a tetrameric structure of this channel from RNA titration experiments using two nonfunctional hClC-1 mutants (Steinmeyer et al., 1994
). There are several issues that can be raised about this previous study that could explain this discrepancy. First, these experiments were performed in Xenopus oocytes and current recordings are subject to contamination with an endogenous calcium-activated Cl– channel. Second, the authors may have underestimated the extent of competition for expression by comparing mixtures of two different hClC-1 alleles with mixtures of hClC-1 with the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR). Because competition for expression is expected to depend upon the number of molecules competing for ribosomal engagement, use of CFTR (twice the molecular weight of hClC-1) contributes
50% less on an equal weight basis than would another hClC-1 allele (higher molar quantity). Finally, these experiments were performed with non-functional mutants and therefore these investigators are limited in their ability to evaluate the true proportion of expressed WT vs mutant channel proteins. This limitation raises some uncertainty as to the validity of their binomial analysis for determining subunit stoichiometry of hClC-1.
Middleton et al. (1994)
discussed two fundamentally different quaternary architectures for the formation of two identical, but independently gated pores in the dimeric ClC-0 protein: either each ion pore is formed completely by one subunit (one pore/one subunit), or each subunit contributes to the formation of both protochannels (shared pore concept). The observation that WT–D136G forms a homogenous population of Cl– channels with novel gating properties raises interesting possibilities for the function of hClC-1. If each hClC-1 subunit encodes a complete ion pore, then there must be a single mechanism that gates both pores in the dimeric channel in an identical fashion. This is analogous to the slow gate of ClC-0, but in hClC-1 this gating mechanism has fast kinetics. Our results are not consistent with a separate mechanism that gates each protochannel separately. In other words, independent gating of two separate ion pores seems improbable based upon the results we obtained with WT–D136G. Additional studies, possibly exploiting the heterotandem strategy with a pore altering mutation, will be needed in the future to determine the true stoichiometry of the hClC-1 pore.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Submitted: 18 June 1996
Accepted: 10 September 1996
| references |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. G.H. Janssen, U. Scholl, C. Domeyer, D. Nothmann, A. Leinenweber, and C. Fahlke Disease-Causing Dysfunctions of Barttin in Bartter Syndrome Type IV J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2009; 20(1): 145 - 153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Garcia-Olivares, A. Alekov, M. R. Boroumand, B. Begemann, P. Hidalgo, and C. Fahlke Gating of human ClC-2 chloride channels and regulation by carboxy-terminal domains J. Physiol., November 15, 2008; 586(22): 5325 - 5336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Detro-Dassen, M. Schanzler, H. Lauks, I. Martin, S. M. z. Berstenhorst, D. Nothmann, D. Torres-Salazar, P. Hidalgo, G. Schmalzing, and C. Fahlke Conserved Dimeric Subunit Stoichiometry of SLC26 Multifunctional Anion Exchangers J. Biol. Chem., February 15, 2008; 283(7): 4177 - 4188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Scholl, S. Hebeisen, A. G. H. Janssen, G. Muller-Newen, A. Alekov, and C. Fahlke Barttin modulates trafficking and function of ClC-K channels PNAS, July 25, 2006; 103(30): 11411 - 11416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Li, M. Kawazaki, K. Ogasahara, and A. Nakagawa The Intracellular Region of ClC-3 Chloride Channel Is in a Partially Folded State and a Monomer. J. Biochem., May 1, 2006; 139(5): 813 - 820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. R. Yusef, L. Zuniga, M. Catalan, M. I. Niemeyer, L. P. Cid, and F. V. Sepulveda Removal of gating in voltage-dependent ClC-2 chloride channel by point mutations affecting the pore and C-terminus CBS-2 domain J. Physiol., April 1, 2006; 572(1): 173 - 181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hebeisen, A. Biela, B. Giese, G. Muller-Newen, P. Hidalgo, and C. Fahlke The Role of the Carboxyl Terminus in ClC Chloride Channel Function J. Biol. Chem., March 26, 2004; 279(13): 13140 - 13147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Zuniga, M. I. Niemeyer, D. Varela, M. Catalan, L. P. Cid, and F. V. Sepulveda The voltage-dependent ClC-2 chloride channel has a dual gating mechanism J. Physiol., March 15, 2004; 555(3): 671 - 682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ryan, R. Rudel, M. Kuchenbecker, and C. Fahlke A novel alteration of muscle chloride channel gating in myotonia levior J. Physiol., December 1, 2002; 545(2): 345 - 354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Miyazaki, T. Kaneko, S. Uchida, S. Sasaki, and Y. Takei Kidney-specific chloride channel, OmClC-K, predominantly expressed in the diluting segment of freshwater-adapted tilapia kidney PNAS, November 26, 2002; 99(24): 15782 - 15787. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F.-F. Wu, A. Ryan, J. Devaney, M. Warnstedt, Z. Korade-Mirnics, B. Poser, M. J. Escriva, E. Pegoraro, A. S. Yee, K. J. Felice, et al. Novel CLCN1 mutations with unique clinical and electrophysiological consequences Brain, November 1, 2002; 125(11): 2392 - 2407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Warnstedt, C. Sun, B. Poser, M. J. Escriva, L. Tranebjarg, T. Torbergsen, M. van Ghelue, and C. Fahlke The Myotonia Congenita Mutation A331T Confers a Novel Hyperpolarization-Activated Gate to the Muscle Chloride Channel ClC-1 J. Neurosci., September 1, 2002; 22(17): 7462 - 7470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Pierno, J.-F. Desaphy, A. Liantonio, M. De Bellis, G. Bianco, A. De Luca, A. Frigeri, G. P. Nicchia, M. Svelto, C. Leoty, et al. Change of chloride ion channel conductance is an early event of slow-to-fast fibre type transition during unloading-induced muscle disuse Brain, July 1, 2002; 125(7): 1510 - 1521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. J. Jentsch, V. Stein, F. Weinreich, and A. A. Zdebik Molecular Structure and Physiological Function of Chloride Channels Physiol Rev, April 1, 2002; 82(2): 503 - 568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. G Vanoye and A. L George Jr Functional characterization of recombinant human ClC-4 chloride channels in cultured mammalian cells J. Physiol., March 1, 2002; 539(2): 373 - 383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-F. Chen and T.-Y. Chen Different Fast-Gate Regulation by External Cl- and H+ of the Muscle-Type Clc Chloride Channels J. Gen. Physiol., July 1, 2001; 118(1): 23 - 32. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Cuppoletti, K. P. Tewari, A. M. Sherry, E. Y. Kupert, and D. H. Malinowska ClC-2 Cl{-} channels in human lung epithelia: activation by arachidonic acid, amidation, and acid-activated omeprazole Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, July 1, 2001; 281(1): C46 - C54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. S. Lamb, R. W. Graeff, G. H. Clayton, R. L. Smith, B. C. Schutte, and P. B. McCray Jr. Ontogeny of CLCN3 Chloride Channel Gene Expression in Human Pulmonary Epithelium Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., April 1, 2001; 24(4): 376 - 381. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C.-W. Lin and T.-Y. Chen Cysteine Modification of a Putative Pore Residue in Clc-0: Implication for the Pore Stoichiometry of Clc Chloride Channels J. Gen. Physiol., October 1, 2000; 116(4): 535 - 546. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Accardi and M. Pusch Fast and Slow Gating Relaxations in the Muscle Chloride Channel Clc-1 J. Gen. Physiol., September 1, 2000; 116(3): 433 - 444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. WALDEGGER and T. J. JENTSCH From Tonus to Tonicity: Physiology of CLC Chloride Channels J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2000; 11(7): 1331 - 1339. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zhang, S. Bendahhou, M. C. Sanguinetti, and L. J. Ptacek Functional consequences of chloride channel gene (CLCN1) mutations causing myotonia congenita Neurology, February 22, 2000; 54(4): 937 - 942. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zhang, M. C. Sanguinetti, H. Kwiecinski, and L. J. Ptacek Mechanism of Inverted Activation of ClC-1 Channels Caused by a Novel Myotonia Congenita Mutation J. Biol. Chem., January 28, 2000; 275(4): 2999 - 3005. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Hume, D. Duan, M. L. Collier, J. Yamazaki, and B. Horowitz Anion Transport in Heart Physiol Rev, January 1, 2000; 80(1): 31 - 81. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Maduke, D. J. Pheasant, and C. Miller High-Level Expression, Functional Reconstitution, and Quaternary Structure of a Prokaryotic Clc-Type Chloride Channel J. Gen. Physiol., November 1, 1999; 114(5): 713 - 722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Lehmann-Horn and K. Jurkat-Rott Voltage-Gated Ion Channels and Hereditary Disease Physiol Rev, October 1, 1999; 79(4): 1317 - 1372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. L. Kurz, H. Klink, I. Jakob, M. Kuchenbecker, S. Benz, F. Lehmann-Horn, and R. Rudel Identification of Three Cysteines as Targets for the Zn2+ Blockade of the Human Skeletal Muscle Chloride Channel J. Biol. Chem., April 23, 1999; 274(17): 11687 - 11692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Pusch, S.-E. Jordt, V. Stein, and T. J Jentsch Chloride dependence of hyperpolarization-activated chloride channel gates J. Physiol., March 1, 1999; 515(2): 341 - 353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Rosenbohm, R. Rudel, and C. Fahlke Regulation of the human skeletal muscle chloride channel hClC-1 by protein kinase C J. Physiol., February 1, 1999; 514(3): 677 - 685. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. F. Raab-Graham and C. A. Vandenberg Tetrameric Subunit Structure of the Native Brain Inwardly Rectifying Potassium Channel Kir 2.2 J. Biol. Chem., July 31, 1998; 273(31): 19699 - 19707. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Fahlke, C. Durr, and A. L. George Jr. Mechanism of Ion Permeation in Skeletal Muscle Chloride Channels J. Gen. Physiol., November 1, 1997; 110(5): 551 - 564. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Schmidt-Rose and T. J. Jentsch Reconstitution of Functional Voltage-gated Chloride Channels from Complementary Fragments of CLC-1 J. Biol. Chem., August 15, 1997; 272(33): 20515 - 20521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Schmidt-Rose and T. J. Jentsch Transmembrane topology of a CLC chloride channel PNAS, July 8, 1997; 94(14): 7633 - 7638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Fahlke, C. L. Beck, and A. L. George Jr. A mutation in autosomal dominant myotonia congenita affects pore properties of the muscle chloride channel PNAS, March 18, 1997; 94(6): 2729 - 2734. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Weinreich and T. J. Jentsch Pores Formed by Single Subunits in Mixed Dimers of Different CLC Chloride Channels J. Biol. Chem., January 19, 2001; 276(4): 2347 - 2353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Fahlke, R. R. Desai, N. Gillani, and A. L. George Jr. Residues Lining the Inner Pore Vestibule of Human Muscle Chloride Channels J. Biol. Chem., January 12, 2001; 276(3): 1759 - 1765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. G Vanoye and A. L George Jr Functional characterization of recombinant human ClC-4 chloride channels in cultured mammalian cells J. Physiol., March 1, 2002; 539(2): 373 - 383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|