The Journal of General Physiology
Scientifica: Experts in Electrophysiology
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 212K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JGP
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ivanova-Nikolova, T. T.
Right arrow Articles by Breitwieser, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ivanova-Nikolova, T. T.
Right arrow Articles by Breitwieser, G. E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
© The Rockefeller University Press, 0022-1295/1997//245/ $5.00
Journal of General Physiology, Volume 109, Number 2, 1997

Article

Effector Contributions to Gβ{gamma}-mediated Signaling as Revealed by Muscarinic Potassium Channel Gating

Tatyana T. Ivanova-Nikolova and Gerda E. Breitwieser

From the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Physiology, Baltimore, Maryland 21205


   ABSTRACT
Top
 ABSTRACT
introduction
 materials and methods
 results
 discussion
 references
 
Receptor-mediated activation of heterotrimeric G proteins leading to dissociation of the G{alpha} subunit from Gβ{gamma} is a highly conserved signaling strategy used by numerous extracellular stimuli. Although Gβ{gamma} subunits regulate a variety of effectors, including kinases, cyclases, phospholipases, and ion channels (Clapham, D.E., and E.J. Neer. 1993. Nature (Lond.). 365:403–406), few tools exist for probing instantaneous Gβ{gamma}-effector interactions, and little is known about the kinetic contributions of effectors to the signaling process. In this study, we used the atrial muscarinic K+ channel, which is activated by direct interactions with Gβ{gamma} subunits (Logothetis, D.E., Y. Kurachi, J. Galper, E.J. Neer, and D.E. Clap. 1987. Nature (Lond.). 325:321–326; Wickman, K., J.A. Iniguez-Liuhi, P.A. Davenport, R. Taussig, G.B. Krapivinsky, M.E. Linder, A.G. Gilman, and D.E. Clapham. 1994. Nature (Lond.). 366: 654–663; Huang, C.-L., P.A. Slesinger, P.J. Casey, Y.N. Jan, and L.Y. Jan. 1995. Neuron. 15:1133–1143), as a sensitive reporter of the dynamics of Gβ{gamma}-effector interactions. Muscarinic K+ channels exhibit bursting behavior upon G protein activation, shifting between three distinct functional modes, characterized by the frequency of channel openings during individual bursts. Acetylcholine concentration (and by inference, the concentration of activated Gβ{gamma}) controls the fraction of time spent in each mode without changing either the burst duration or channel gating within individual modes. The picture which emerges is of a Gβ{gamma} effector with allosteric regulation and an intrinsic "off" switch which serves to limit its own activation. These two features combine to establish exquisite channel sensitivity to changes in Gβ{gamma} concentration, and may be indicative of the factors regulating other Gβ{gamma}-modulated effectors.

Key Words: signal transduction • GTP binding proteins • muscarinic receptor • inward rectifier K+ channel • atrial myocytes

Address correspondence to G.E. Breitwieser, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Physiology, 725 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205. Fax: 410-955-0461; E-mail: gbreitwi{at}welchlink.welch.jhu.edu

Abbreviations: ACh, acetylcholine


   introduction
Top
 ABSTRACT
 introduction
materials and methods
 results
 discussion
 references
 
Heterotrimeric GTP-binding proteins (G proteins) transduce signals from an extensive family of receptors to a variety of cellular effectors which include plasma membrane–localized enzymes and ion channels (Clapham and Neer, 1993). Molecular dissection of G protein–mediated signal transduction pathways has revealed roles for both of the products of receptor-mediated G protein activation, namely G{alpha}-GTP and Gβ{gamma} subunits (Birnbaumer et al., 1990Go; Birnbaumer, 1992Go; Clapham and Neer, 1993). The distinctive functional properties of G{alpha} and Gβ{gamma} subunits suggest the possibility for regulatory mechanisms unique to each subunit class.

Resolution of the kinetic features of Gβ{gamma} interactions with cellular effectors may provide insights into the distinctive features of Gβ{gamma}-mediated signaling. The atrial G protein–gated inwardly rectifying K+ channel (muscarinic K+ channel), comprised of a heterotetramer (Yang et al., 1995Go) of GIRK1 and CIR (GIRK4) (Krapivinsky et al., 1995Go; Hedin et al., 1996Go), has been extensively studied as a direct G protein effector (Kurachi et al., 1992Go; Yamada et al., 1994aGo). Both G{alpha} and Gβ{gamma} subunits have been implicated in its activation mechanism (Birnbaumer et al., 1990Go; Kurachi et al., 1992Go; Clapham and Neer, 1993), although recent mutational analysis and biochemical studies have clearly defined a primary role for Gβ{gamma} subunits (Huang et al., 1995Go; Slesinger et al., 1995Go; Pessia et al., 1995Go; Kunkel and Peralta, 1995Go). In this study, we used the atrial muscarinic K+ channel as a prototype Gβ{gamma} effector to probe alterations in effector activity in response to agonist-induced alterations in Gβ{gamma} concentrations. We find that atrial muscarinic K+ channels gate in bursts of activity, and although burst duration is not a function of Gβ{gamma} concentration, the heterogeneous gating kinetics within bursts are characterized by Gβ{gamma}-mediated shifts in modal preference. These results demonstrate that muscarinic K+ channel activity can be "titrated" by binding of variable numbers of Gβ{gamma}, and provide evidence for muscarinic K+ channel inactivation or desensitization.


   materials and methods
Top
 ABSTRACT
 introduction
 materials and methods
results
 discussion
 references
 
Atrial myocytes were obtained from the bullfrog Rana catesbeiana as described previously (Scherer and Breitwieser, 1990Go). Single-channel currents were recorded with standard high-resolution patch-clamp techniques (Hamill et al., 1981Go) using 1 mm O.D. square bore glass (Glass Co. of America, Millville, NJ). The membrane potential was zeroed with the following bath solution (in mM): 150 KCl, 5 EGTA, 5 glucose, 1.6 MgCl2, 5 HEPES (pH adjusted to 7.4). Pipettes contained (in mM): 150 KCl, 1 CaCl2, 1.6 MgCl2, 5 HEPES (pH adjusted to 7.4). Acetylcholine (ACh)1 was added to the pipette solution. The excised patch configuration was used to examine channel activity in the presence of GTP{gamma}S; bath solution for these experiments contained pipette solution plus 100 µM GTP{gamma}S ± ATP or AppNHp (as described in the individual experiments). Whole cell currents were recorded as previously described (Scherer and Breitwieser, 1990Go). Currents were recorded with a LIST EPC-7 amplifier, filtered at 2 kHz (8-pole Bessel filter; 17 µs rise time), and stored on computer. Data acquisition and analysis were performed using PCLAMP software (versions 5.5.1 and 6.0; Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA). Channel opening and closing transitions were identified with the half-amplitude threshold-crossing algorithm. Bursts were defined as a series of openings (single events were eliminated from the analysis) separated by closed intervals shorter than some critical interval, tc . In most records the occurrence of bursts was infrequent so the choice of tc was not critical and the division of the record into bursts was unambiguous. In a few cases of high activity, when the separation was less clear, tc was calculated as described previously (Magleby and Pallotta, 1983Go) and had values between 120 and 140 ms. For each defined burst, the duration, the number of apparent open intervals and the probability of a channel being open within a burst, po, were calculated. The po value was calculated as the ratio of the total open time in the burst to the burst length. When indicated, the individual events from selected bursts were compiled to generate histograms of open- and closed-interval durations. All experiments were done at a holding potential of –90 mV (unless otherwise noted) and at 20–22°C.


   results
Top
 ABSTRACT
 introduction
 materials and methods
 results
discussion
 references
 
Heterogeneity of Unitary Muscarinic K+ Currents
Acetylcholine (ACh)1 released upon stimulation of the vagus nerve causes slowing of heart rate by activation of muscarinic receptors and the subsequent opening of muscarinic K+ channels in the sinoatrial node and atrium. Unitary currents through muscarinic K+ channels were recorded from cell-attached patches on frog atrial myocytes in the presence of different concentrations of ACh in the pipette. Fig. 1 A shows an example of a continuous record of single-channel currents activated by 1 µM ACh; the membrane potential of the patch was held at –90 mV. Channel gating behavior is heterogeneous, characterized by both apparent clustering of openings into bursts and spontaneous changes in the pattern of channel activity.


Figure 1
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Figure 1 Bursting activity of muscarinic K+ channels in atrial myocytes. (A) Continuous single-channel record from a cell-attached patch. The patch pipette contained 1 µM ACh. Downward deflections correspond to inward currents. Calibration: 5 pA, 100 ms. (B) Distribution of burst lengths for 1 µM ACh (combined data from seven patches), recorded at a membrane potential of –90 mV. The continuous line represents the monoexponential fit used to estimate the time constant, {tau}b, which was 193.4 ms.

 
Muscarinic K+ Channels Gate in Bursts
Records, such as that illustrated in Fig. 1 A, indicate that bursts of muscarinic K+ channel openings are separated by long silent periods; individual bursts were therefore considered to reflect the activity of a single ion channel and analyzed further. Fig. 1 B illustrates the burst length histogram obtained from activity elicited by 1 µM ACh, plotted on a logarithmic time scale. The histogram was best fitted by a single exponential term with {tau}b = 193.4 ms. Burst length distributions were also obtained at 50 nM and 0.5 µM ACh (Table I). No significant differences between burst length time constants were evident, indicating that agonist concentration does not determine burst length. Furthermore, the holding potential (–60 or –90 mV) did not significantly affect the burst length distribution obtained at 0.5 µM ACh (Table I).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table I Burst Duration Time Constants for Atrial Muscarininc K+ Channels Determined under a Variety of Experimental Conditions

 
The transient nature of Gβ{gamma} interactions with effectors presents the possibility that the dynamics of G protein turnover may limit channel burst length under physiological conditions. All heterotrimeric G proteins exploit a highly conserved signaling strategy in which the metastable GTP-bound state of the G{alpha} subunit is used as a molecular clock (Bourne et al., 1990Go, 1991Go). When GTP is hydrolyzed to GDP, G{alpha} is inactivated, and its affinity for free Gβ{gamma} is increased. The potential contributions of G protein turnover to the kinetics of G protein–mediated signaling can be eliminated with the hydrolysis-resistant GTP analogue, GTP{gamma}S. Binding of GTP{gamma}S to G{alpha} persistently activates G proteins, constraining both G{alpha} and Gβ{gamma} to their active states, reducing the signaling pathway to diffusion-limited interactions between Gβ{gamma} and the channel. Fig. 2 A illustrates representative unitary K+ currents recorded from an excised, inside-out membrane patch in the presence of 100 µM GTP{gamma}S. In the presence of GTP{gamma}S, channel activity was similar to that observed in cell-attached patches in the presence of 1 µM ACh. Indeed, comparison of the burst length distributions displayed in Fig. 1 B and 2 B reveals no significant differences in {tau}b for the two conditions (Table I). Thus, the combined data in Figs. 1 and 2 suggest that muscarinic K+ channel burst duration is not determined by agonist concentration, nor the dynamics of G protein turnover, i.e., GTP hydrolysis, presenting the possibility that burst length is determined by a property intrinsic to the muscarinic K+ channel itself, i.e., inactivation or desensitization in the continued presence of Gβ{gamma}, or may be a feature of the Gβ{gamma}-channel interaction.


Figure 2
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Figure 2 Gating of muscarinic K+ channels in the presence of GTP{gamma}S. (A) Continuous record of single channel activity observed in inside-out patch following the application of 100 µM GTP{gamma}S. AMP-PNP (1 mM) was also present in the bath solution to inhibit ATP-sensitive K+ channels. Membrane potential was held at –90 mV. Calibration: 5 pA, 100 ms. (B) Burst length histogram for the bursts recorded in the presence of 100 µM GTP{gamma}S. The continuous line indicates the monoexponential fit to the data; {tau}b = 190.4 ms.

 
Heterogeneity of Muscarinic K+ Channel Gating within Bursts
Although channel burst duration is independent of the agonist concentration, inspection of current records reveals two features of muscarinic K+ channel gating worthy of further exploration. First, gating is heterogeneous over a wide range of conditions including different agonist concentrations (Fig. 4 A), in excised patches following GTP{gamma}S-mediated activation of the channel (Fig. 2 A), and at different membrane potentials over the range from –110 to –40 mV (Fig. 3). Second, despite the apparent gating heterogeneity, there is a systematic increase in the open probability during individual bursts as the ACh concentration is increased, as illustrated in Fig. 4 A for individual bursts recorded in the presence of two different ACh concentrations. To determine whether these features of muscarinic K+ channel gating could be related to the level of activated Gβ{gamma}, we employed several complementary approaches, at low (50 nM) and high (1 µM) ACh concentrations, to separate bursts into two or more discrete and kinetically simplified gating modes. First, we examined the distributions of the number of apparent openings for bursts composed of two or more openings. These distributions should consist of a sum of geometric components, the number of components being equal to the number of open states, although the contributions of some components may be too small to resolve (Colquhoun and Hawkes, 1983Go). Examples of histograms of the apparent openings per burst are presented in Fig. 4 B for 50 nM and 1 µM ACh. Both distributions were best fitted by a sum of two geometrics, µ1 and µ2: the first component had a mean value of approximately three openings per burst, while the mean of the second component was ~15. Comparison of the fits to these distributions reveals that the agonist concentration determines the proportion of bursts in the two groups: the fraction of bursts containing a larger number of apparent openings increased from 36 ± 6% to 62 ± 5% when comparing bursts obtained in 50 nM and 1 µM ACh, respectively, while the mean values for µ1 and µ2 were similar for the two concentrations.


Figure 4
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Figure 4 Kinetic heterogeneity of individual muscarinic K+ channel bursts. (A) Multiple gating patterns of the channel at low (50 nM) and saturating (1 µM) concentrations of ACh. Two sets of bursts illustrate the scope of kinetic heterogeneity of gating. The probability that a channel resides in an open conformation during the burst, po, is as follows for each trace: 50 nM ACh (1) 0.078; (2) 0.02; (3) 0.164; (4) 0.099; (5) 0.026; (6) 0.071; (7) 0.166; (8) 0.079; (9) 0.231; and (10) 0.060; 1 µM ACh (1) 0.31; (2) 0.057; (3) 0.152; (4) 0.361; (5) 0.559; (6) 0.034; (7) 0.173; (8) 0.202; (9) 0.065; and (10) 0.652. Calibration: 5 pA, 50 ms. (B) Distributions of the number of apparent openings per burst. Distributions are shown for ACh at concentrations of 50 nM (left panel) and 1 µM (right panel) and were fitted by the sum of two geometrics (Colquhoun and Hawkes, 1981Go): P(r) = a1µ1–1(1-µ1–1)r -1 + a2µ2–1 (1-µ2–1)r -1 (continuous line). The means, µI (and percentage areas (ai)) are 3.7 ± 0.4 (64 ± 6%) and 19.2 ± 5.6 (36 ± 6%) at 50 nM ACh and 2.8 ± 0.5 (38 ± 5%) and 14.4 ± 2.0 (62 ± 5%) at 1 µM ACh. In the presence of 1 µM ACh, a small population of very long bursts was observed. These long bursts contained too many openings (200–1,000) to be fitted by the distributions described above. Although such long bursts were too infrequent to be analyzed, they contributed substantially to the total single channel activity because of their duration. (C) Frequency of channel activations within bursts. Plots of apparent number of openings, N, vs. burst duration, B are shown for the experiments illustrated in B. Each symbol represents N and B values determined for an individual burst. Lines in the figures were derived from the peaks of the frequency distributions plotted in D. (D) Distributions of f values in 50 nM (left panel) and 1 µM (right panel) ACh for the data shown in C. Both histograms are fitted by the sum of three Gaussian distributions. The frequency of openings within bursts, f, was estimated as N/B. Peak frequencies of channel activation were independent of the agonist concentration and have values of 0.03 ms–1 (low-f), 0.06 ms–1 (medium-f) and 0.12 ms–1 (high-f). At 50 nM ACh, 40% of bursts were low-f, 47% medium-f and 13% the high-f type. The proportion of high-frequency bursts increased with ACh concentration; at 1 µM ACh the relative areas of low-, medium-, and high-frequency bursts were 25%, 35% and 40%, respectively.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Figure 3 Bursts of muscarinic K+ channel activity at various holding potentials. Representative records from an inside-out patch following application of 100 µM GTP{gamma}S plus 1 mM adenylylimidodiphosphate. Holding potential was varied as indicated. Calibration: 5 pA, 100 ms.

 
Classification of bursts into groups according to the two geometric components in Fig. 4 B hinted at the existence of distinct gating modes, but even among bursts with an equivalent number of openings, the gating behavior remained heterogeneous with respect to both mean open time and open probability. Therefore, as an alternative approach to grouping bursts and identifying distinct patterns of gating, we plotted the number of apparent openings in the burst, N, vs. the length of the burst, B, for each burst. Illustrated in Fig. 4 C are plots for bursts recorded in the presence of either 50 nM ACh or 1 µM ACh. Each symbol in the figure represents the kinetic behavior of an individual burst. Histograms of frequencies of openings within individual bursts (f = N/B) were generated from the same bursts illustrated in Fig. 4 C to empirically determine the most populated regions of the N-B plots. The histograms, illustrated in Fig. 4 D, define three distinct peaks centered around f values of 0.03 ms–1, 0.06 ms–1, and 0.12 ms–1. These frequencies were therefore used as the criteria for separation of channel gating behavior into low-, medium-, and high-f modes (and were used to generate the lines in Fig. 4 C). Although the predominant frequencies of channel openings were independent of ACh concentration, comparison of the two plots in Fig. 4 D indicates that modal preference is a function of the ACh concentration. At 50 nM ACh, low- and medium-f behavior dominate the f -histogram, while saturating ACh concentrations favor the high-f mode. To determine the maximal effect on modal preference, we also analyzed the frequency of openings within individual bursts, f, for a total of 273 bursts, recorded in excised patches exposed to 100 µM GTP{gamma}S. The frequency distribution after GTP{gamma}S activation revealed three distinct peaks, corresponding to the low-f (0.032 ms–1; relative area 13.5%), medium-f (0.064 ms–1; relative area 36.5%), and high-f (0.116 ms–1; relative area 50%) modes characterized previously in the cell-attached configuration in the presence of ACh (Fig. 4 D). Thus, the heterogeneous kinetic behavior observed in the presence of GTP{gamma}S reflects sojourns of the channel in the same dominant gating modes found in the presence of ACh.

Kinetics of Muscarinic K+ Channel Gating within Distinct Gating Modes
Although ACh concentrations establish modal preference for muscarinic K+ channels, all modes are represented at any given ACh concentration. To characterize the kinetic behavior of the channel in each gating mode, we analyzed histograms of open and closed interval durations generated from low-, medium-, and high-f burst populations recorded in 1 µM ACh (Fig. 5). For this analysis, only bursts with f values within 2 SD of the mean of a particular f population were included (eliminating bursts in which there was an obvious switch in gating mode during the burst). Each open and closed state adds an additional exponential component to these distributions (Colquhoun and Hawkes, 1981Go). Within each mode, a sum of three exponentials provided a satisfactory fit to the open time distributions (Fig. 5, left). The fast, intermediate, and slow components showed little variation from one mode to the next, and had time constants ({tau}o1 – {tau}o3) of ~0.18, 1.5, and 5.0 ms, respectively. The relative areas under the individual exponentials, however, were quite different for the three modes and verified the general observation that the low-f bursts were predominantly made of short openings while high-f bursts were dominated by longer ones.


Figure 5
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Figure 5 Distributions of open and closed times for individual gating modes. Bursts were compiled from those obtained in 1 µM ACh. Three populations of bursts (labeled low-f, medium-f, and high-f), selected from bursts within 2 SD of the peak frequencies of 0.03 ms–1, 0.06 ms–1 and 0.12 ms–1, were used to generate open and closed time histograms. The histograms constructed from bursts within each mode are fitted by the sum of three exponentials (continuous lines) and are plotted for each mode to facilitate comparisons. Also plotted are the individual fits to each exponential (dashed lines). The relative proportion for each component is given in parentheses after the time constant. In the low-f mode the fast, intermediate, and slow open time constants ({tau}o1–{tau}o3) are 0.19 ms (52%), 1.7 ms (32%), and 5.6 ms (16%) and the closed time constants are 0.34 ms (34%), 1.6 ms (9%), and 67.8 ms (57%). In the medium-f mode the open time constants are 0.16 ms (45%), 1.2 ms (33%), and 4.8 ms (22 %) and the closed time constants are 0.17 ms (40%), 1.3 ms (25%), and 23.9 ms (35%). In the high-f mode the open time constants are 0.2 ms (26%), 1.7 ms (29%), and 4.6 ms (45%) and the closed time constants are 0.17 ms (56%), 1.2 ms (28%), and 12.3 ms (16%).

 
Closed intervals were distributed over a wider time range than open times, and fitting of closed-time histograms obtained from randomly compiled bursts required more than three exponentials. After modal classification of the bursts at 1 µM ACh, however, three exponential terms were sufficient to describe the closed times in each mode (Fig. 5, right). The fast and intermediate components had similar time constants for the three kinetic modes ({tau}c1 = 0.23 ms and {tau}c2 = 1.4 ms), whereas the third time constant, {tau}c3 , decreased as the frequency increased, being 67.8 ms for the low-f bursts, 23.9 ms for medium-f, and 12.3 ms for the high-f bursts.

Similar analysis of mode-segregated bursts recorded from GTP{gamma}S-activated patches was performed (data not shown). The fits to the open-time distributions yielded fast, intermediate, and slow time constants which were similar in all modes and comparable to those observed in the presence of ACh ({tau}o1 = 0.14 ms; {tau}o2 = 1.4 ms; {tau}o3 = 4.0 ms). The fast and intermediate closed time constants had mean values of {tau}c1 = 0.15 ms and {tau}c2 = 1.3 ms in all modes, while the slow closed time constant, {tau}c3, was once again the primary discriminator between modes, being 80.0 ms for the low-f mode, 23.1 ms for the medium-f mode, and 12.4 ms for the high-f mode. These results suggest that the channel enters the same gating modes whether the G proteins are activated by GTP or GTP{gamma}S, with a minimum of three open (O1-O2-O3) and three closed (C1-C2-C3) states within each mode. The values for all three open time constants ({tau}o1– {tau}o3) as well as the fast and intermediate closed time constants ({tau}c1 and {tau}c2) are similar for the three modes. As long as the conducting and nonconducting states of the channel can be regarded as reporters of distinct conformational states of the protein, our results imply that gating in any mode arises from a common set of five conformational states O1 . . . C2 and one additional nonconducting state C3 which is the main kinetic discriminator between the modes. The concentration of agonist (and presumably the concentration of Gβ{gamma}) has the unique role of establishing modal preference, i.e., determining the ease with which the channel enters the higher frequency gating modes.

Physiological Relevance of Modal Shifts in Gating
Activation of whole cell muscarinic K+ current (IK[ACh]) by application of ACh incorporates both the kinetic changes within bursts which have been described in previous sections, as well as potential alterations in interburst intervals and the number of functional channels. To determine the physiological relevance of the modal shifts in gating within bursts, three measures of muscarinic K+ channel activity were compared at a range of ACh concentrations, Fig. 6. As a standard for comparison, the steady state whole cell dose response for ACh was plotted (data normalized to the current at 1 µM ACh). To assess the dose response relation for ACh-mediated shifts in po within bursts, the average po within 150 random (i.e., non-mode-segregated) bursts was tabulated, at three ACh concentrations (50 nM, 0.5 µM, and 1 µM). The average pos were normalized to the value obtained at 1 µM ACh (po = 0.3). Finally, to determine the overall dose response relation for ACh at the single channel level (bursts plus interburst intervals), the po of representative recordings in the cell-attached configuration was determined at 50 nM, 0.5, and 1 µM ACh (normalized to the po obtained at 1 µM ACh {approx} 0.047). All three measures of the dose response relation are similar, suggesting that ACh does not differentially affect the interburst intervals, and therefore that the ACh-induced shifts in modal gating within bursts are the primary determinant of the overall, whole cell current response.


Figure 6
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Figure 6 Acetylcholine (ACh) titration of muscarinic K+ channel activity. Three measures of muscarinic K+ channel activity are compared at varying ACh concentrations, from 5 x 10–8 to 10–4 M. Open circles indicate the whole cell steady state current, IK[ACh], at 60 s after application of various ACh concentrations, normalized to the steady state (60 s) current obtained in 10–6 M ACh. Each point represents the mean ± SEM of at least four cells. The line indicates the fit obtained with the Hill equation, with Vmax = 111.7%, K = 1.7 x 10–7 M, and n = 0.99. Filled circles represent the po of representative recordings obtained in the cell-attached configuration at various ACh concentrations (normalized to 10–6 M ACh, po = 0.0468). Estimates of po were obtained from at least three patches at each concentration (recording periods greater than 2 min in each condition). Filled triangles represent the average po for representative bursts (non-mode-segregated) obtained at various ACh concentrations, normalized to the po of bursts obtained at 10–6 M ACh (po = 0.301). For each concentration, 150 random bursts from multiple patches were averaged.

 

   discussion
Top
 ABSTRACT
 introduction
 materials and methods
 results
 discussion
references
 
This study reveals two novel aspects of muscarinic K+ channel gating. First, muscarinic K+ channels gate in discrete bursts of activity. Burst duration is monoexponentially distributed and insensitive to a variety of factors which modulate muscarinic K+ channel activity, including agonist concentration, membrane potential, and G protein turnover (i.e., GTP hydrolysis). Second, the gating of muscarinic K+ channels within bursts is heterogeneous, but discrete modes of gating can be defined based on the frequency of channel opening within a burst. Agonist concentration determines modal preference, although all modes are represented at all agonist concentrations. Agonist-induced shifts in modal preference are the main determinant of whole cell IK[ACh]. We will consider these results in light of extensive studies which suggest Gβ{gamma} to be an integral activator of muscarinic K+ channels (Logothetis et al., 1987Go; Kurachi et al., 1992Go; Wickman et al., 1994Go; Yamada et al., 1994aGo; Krapivinsky et al., 1995Go), with direct binding to the channel recently demonstrated in vitro (Huang et al., 1995Go; Slesinger et al., 1995Go; Pessia et al., 1995Go; Kunkel and Peralta, 1995Go). It is also possible that additional, muscarinic receptor- or G protein–activated signaling pathways modulate muscarinic K+ channel activation (e.g., Scherer and Breitwieser, 1990Go; Yamada et al., 1994bGo). Since these additional pathways are presumably also activated in a dose-dependent manner by ACh, our results at present cannot distinguish between the primary Gβ{gamma} interaction with the muscarinic K+ channel and these modulatory influences. We thus limit our discussion to the minimal model which requires only direct Gβ{gamma} interaction with the channel heteromultimer.

Burst Duration Is Independent of Gβ{gamma} Concentrations
The simplest model for determination of muscarinic K+ channel burst duration consistent with the data is one in which the channel enters a discrete inactivated or desensitized state (independent of Gβ{gamma}), as indicated in the following scheme.

Formula

The channel undergoes repeated transitions between closed and open states (as determined by Gβ{gamma} interactions) and, with a rate constant k1 (reflected in the time constant for burst duration), enters the inactivated state. k–1 represents the time constant for exit from the inactivated state, and can in principal be obtained from interburst intervals. In practice, however, this is not possible since it is difficult to unequivocally establish the number of channels in the patch (maximal patch open probability is 0.08–0.1). Nevertheless, the existence of an inactivated, nonresponsive state limits the activity of the channel, and, if Gβ{gamma} subunits interact directly with muscarinic K+ channels, has implications for Gβ{gamma}-mediated signaling.

Gβ{gamma} subunits lack an intrinsic enzymatic activity which serves to periodically alter the conformational state of the complex (Sondek et al., 1996Go; Neer and Smith, 1996Go) and hence the affinity for either effectors or G{alpha} subunits. Dissociation of Gβ{gamma} from effector binding sites may therefore be the rate-limiting step in termination of Gβ{gamma}-mediated signaling. Inactivation of muscarinic K+ channels presents the possibility that effectors themselves may contribute to termination of Gβ{gamma}-mediated responses. Channel inactivation may be accompanied by either a transient decrease in channel affinity for Gβ{gamma} (i.e., a conformational change may occur in the Gβ{gamma} binding site), or it may occur despite the continued presence of bound Gβ{gamma}, with subsequent dissociation of Gβ{gamma} while the channel is inactivated.

Modal Preference Determination by Gβ{gamma} Concentrations
The native muscarinic K+ channel in atrial myocytes contains multiple structurally heterogeneous, Gβ{gamma} binding sites within what is most likely a tetrameric channel structure (Krapivinsky et al., 1995Go; Yang et al., 1995Go). In this context, the simplest model of channel gating would require the occupancy of all Gβ{gamma} binding sites before channel activation. The ability of ACh (i.e., Gβ{gamma}) to titrate modal preference, however, favors more complex models, in which distinct functional consequences, i.e., modal shifts, accompany binding of successive Gβ{gamma}. While our data at present cannot be constrained to a model which imposes a one-for-one correlation between the number of bound Gβ{gamma} and a particular gating mode, a reaction scheme similar to the Monod-Wyman-Changeux allosteric model (Monod et al., 1965Go) in which all modes are interconnected, and binding of increasing numbers of Gβ{gamma} subunits facilitates transitions to the high-f mode is entirely consistent with our observations. A similar mechanism has been proposed for G protein–mediated inhibition of neuronal N-type Ca2+ channels (Boland and Bean, 1993Go; Delcour et al., 1993Go; Delcour and Tsien, 1993Go), which has recently been shown to be mediated by Gβ{gamma} (Ikeda, 1996Go; Herlitze et al., 1996Go).

Modal Shifts as a Means of Increasing Gβ{gamma} Signaling Specificity
Some effectors are activated in a highly specific manner by particular subtypes of Gβ{gamma} (Inguez-Liuhi et al., 1992Go; Schmidt et al., 1992Go; Kleuss et al., 1993Go; Wu et al., 1993Go) while other effectors are activated equally well by all Gβ{gamma} subtypes (Clapham and Neer, 1993; Wickman et al., 1994Go; Ueda et al., 1994Go). Muscarinic K+ channels fall into the second class, i.e., all Gβ{gamma} subtype combinations are equally effective at the activation of the channel (Wickman et al., 1994Go), with the exception of transducin β{gamma} (Yamada et al., 1994aGo). This presents a conceptual difficulty, since it implies that activation of any G protein–coupled receptor within the cell should contribute to the population of activated Gβ{gamma} and thus muscarinic K+ channel activation. Signaling specificity must therefore arise on the basis of other mechanisms. Our results suggest a possible means for increasing signaling specificity and/or sensitivity in spite of a lack of Gβ{gamma} subtype specificity, namely, the existence of multiple functional states of an effector, which are dependent upon the number of bound Gβ{gamma}. The efficiency of signal transduction via a population of Gβ{gamma} would thus depend not only on the amount of free Gβ{gamma} and the relative abundance of effectors, but also on the number of functional modes accessible to the various effectors and on the ability of Gβ{gamma} to control the equilibrium between these modes. In the case of the muscarinic K+ channel, the combination of an intrinsic inactivation mechanism which may serve to limit the duration of the Gβ{gamma} interaction plus allosteric regulation via multiple Gβ{gamma} subunits (which is poised to provide significant whole cell K+ current only at high Gβ{gamma} concentrations) produces a system which is rapidly regulated and highly sensitive to dynamic changes in Gβ{gamma} concentration.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank E. Nikolova, F. Sigworth, M. Li, and W. Agnew for helpful comments at different stages of the work. We thank C. Frederick Lo for providing the whole cell acetylcholine dose response data.

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (HL41972), a National Science Foundation Career Advancement Award (9407251) and an E.I. from the American Heart Association (AHA) National Center (900126) to G.E. Breitwieser. T.T. Ivanova-Nikolova was partially supported by a Fellowship from the AHA Maryland Affiliate.

Submitted: 14 May 1996
Accepted: 8 October 1996


   references
Top
 ABSTRACT
 introduction
 materials and methods
 results
 discussion
 references
 

Birnbaumer L. Receptor-to-effector signaling through G proteins: roles for β{gamma} dimers as well as {alpha} subunits, Cell, 1992, 71, 1069–1072.[Medline]

Birnbaumer L, Abramowitz J & Brown AM. Receptor- effector coupling by G proteins, Biochim Biophys Acta, 1990, 1031, 163–224.[Medline]

Boland LM & Bean BP. Modulation of N-type calcium channels in bullfrog sympathetic neurons by luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone: kinetics and voltage dependence, J Neurosci, 1993, 13, 516–533.[Abstract]

Bourne HR, Sanders DA & McCormick F. The GTPase superfamily: a conserved switch for diverse cell functions, Nature (Lond), 1990, 348, 125–132.[Medline]

Bourne HR, Sanders DA & McCormick F. The GTPase superfamily: conserved structure and molecular mechanism, Nature (Lond), 1991, 349, 117–127.[Medline]

Clapham DE. ,, and E.J. Neer. New roles for G-protein β{gamma}-dimers in transmembrane signalling, Nature (Lond), 1993, 365, 403–406.[Medline]

Colquhoun D & Hawkes AG. On the stochastic properties of single ion channels, Proc R Soc B, 1981, 211, 205–235.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Colquhoun, D., and A.G. Hawkes. 1983. The principles of the stochastic interpretation of ion-channel mechanisms. In Single Channel Recording. B. Sakmann and E. Neher, editors. (Plenum Press New York, NY), pp. 135–175.

Delcour AH, Lipscombe D & Tsien RW. Multiple modes of N-type calcium channel activity distinguished by differences in gating kinetics, J Neurosci, 1993, 13, 181–194.[Abstract]

Delcour AH & Tsien RW. Altered prevelance of gating modes in neurotransmitter inhibition of N-type calcium channels, Science (Wash DC), 1993, 259, 980–984.[Abstract]

Hamill OP, Marty A, Neher E, Sakmann B & Sigworth FJ. Improved patch clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches, Pflugers Archiv, 1981, 391, 85–100.[Medline]

Hedin KE, Lim NF & Clapham DE. Cloning of a Xenopus laevis inwardly rectifying K+ channel subunit that permits GIRK1 expression of IK[ACh]currents in oocytes, Neuron, 1996, 16, 423–429.[Medline]

Herlitze S, Garcia DE, Mackie K, Hille B, Scheuer T & Catterall WA. Modulation of Ca2+channels by G-protein β{gamma} subunits, Nature (Lond), 1996, 380, 258–262.[Medline]

Huang C-L, Slesinger PA, Casey PJ, Jan YN & Jan LY. Evidence that direct binding of Gβ{gamma} to the GIRK1 G protein-gated inwardly rectifying K+channel is important for channel activation, Neuron, 1995, 15, 1133–1143.[Medline]

Ikeda SR. Voltage-dependent modulation of N-type calcium channels by G-protein β{gamma} subunits, Nature (Lond), 1996, 380, 255–258.[Medline]

Inguez-Liuhi JA, Simon MI, Robishaw JD & Gilman AG. G-protein β{gamma} subunits synthesized in Sf9 cells, J Biol Chem, 1992, 267, 23409–23417.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kleuss C, Scherubl H, Hescheler J, Schultz G & Wittig B. Selectivity in signal transduction determined by {gamma} subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins, Science (Wash DC), 1993, 259, 832–834.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Krapivinsky G, Gordon EA, Wickman K, Velimirovic B, Krapivinsky L & Clapham DE. The G-protein-gated atrial K+ channel IK[ACh] is a heteromultimer of two inwardly rectifying K+-channel proteins, Nature (Lond), 1995, 374, 135–141.[Medline]

Kunkel MT & Peralta EG. Identification of domains conferring G protein regulation on inward rectifier potassium channels, Cell, 1995, 83, 443–449.[Medline]

Kurachi Y, Tung RT, Ito H & Nakajima T. G protein activation of cardiac muscarinic K+channels, Prog Neurobiol, 1992, 39, 229–246.[Medline]

Logothetis DE, Kurachi Y, Galper J, Neer EJ & Clapham DE. The β{gamma} subunits of GTP-binding proteins activate the muscarinic K+channel in heart, Nature (Lond), 1987, 325, 321–326.[Medline]

Magleby KL & Pallotta BS. Burst kinetics of single calcium-activated potassium channels in cultured rat muscle, J Physiol, 1983, 344, 605–623.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Monod J, Wyman J & Changeux JP. On the nature of allosteric transitions: a plausible model, J Mol Biol, 1965, 12, 88–118.[Medline]

Neer EJ & Smith TF. G protein heterodimers: new structures propel new questions, Cell, 1996, 84, 175–178.[Medline]

Pessia M, Bond CT, Kavanaugh MP & Adelman JP. Contributions of the C-terminal domain to gating properties of inward rectifier potassium channels, Neuron, 1995, 14, 1039–1045.[Medline]

Scherer RW & Breitwieser GE. Arachidonic acid metabolites alter G protein-mediated signal transduction in heart: effects on muscarinic K+channels, J Gen Physiol, 1990, 96, 735–755.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schmidt CJ, Thomas TC, Levine MA & Neer EJ. Specificity of G protein β and {gamma} subunit interactions, J Biol Chem, 1992, 267, 13807–13810.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Slesinger PA, Reuveny E, Jan YN & Jan LY. Identification of structural elements involved in G protein gating of the GIRK1 potassium channel, Neuron, 1995, 15, 1145–1156.[Medline]

Sondek J, Bohm A, Lambright DG, Hamm HE & Sigler PB. Crystal structure of a G protein β{gamma} dimer at 2.1 A resolution, Nature (Lond), 1996, 379, 369–374.[Medline]

Ueda N, Iniguez-Liuhi JA, Lee E, Smrcka AV, Robishaw JD & Gilman AG. G protein β{gamma} subunits. Simplified purification and properties of novel isoforms, J Biol Chem, 1994, 269, 4388–4395.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wickman K, Iniguez-Liuhi JA, Davenport PA, Taussig R, Krapivinsky GB, Linder ME, Gilman AG & Clapham DE. Recombinant G-protein β{gamma}-subunits activate the muscarinic-gated atrial potassium channel, Nature (Lond), 1994, 368, 255–257.[Medline]

Wu D, Katz A & Simon MI. Activation of phospholipase C-β 2 by the {alpha} and β{gamma} subunits of trimeric GTP-binding protein, PNAS, 1993, 90, 5297–5301.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yamada M, Ho Y-K, Lee RH, Kontani K, Takahashi K, Katada T & Kurachi Y. Muscarinic K+channels are activated by β{gamma} subunits and inhibited by the GDP-bound form of subunit of transducin, Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 1994a, 200, 1484–1490.[Medline]

Yamada M, Terzic A & Kurachi Y. Regulation of potassium channels by G-protein subunits and arachidonic acid metabolites, Methods Enzymol, 1994b, 238, 394–422.[Medline]

Yang J, Jan NY & Jan LY. Determination of the subunit stoichiometry of an inwardly rectifying potassium channel, Neuron, 1995, 15, 1441–1447.[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JGPHome page
A. V. Zholos, A. A. Zholos, and T. B. Bolton
G-protein-gated TRP-like Cationic Channel Activated by Muscarinic Receptors: Effect of Potential on Single-channel Gating
J. Gen. Physiol., April 26, 2004; 123(5): 581 - 598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. G. Hommers, M. J. Lohse, and M. Bunemann
Regulation of the Inward Rectifying Properties of G-protein-activated Inwardly Rectifying K+ (GIRK) Channels by Gbeta gamma Subunits
J. Biol. Chem., January 3, 2003; 278(2): 1037 - 1043.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Physiol.Home page
T. Takigawa and C. Alzheimer
Phasic and tonic attenuation of EPSPs by inward rectifier K+ channels in rat hippocampal pyramidal cells
J. Physiol., February 15, 2002; 539(1): 67 - 75.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JGPHome page
J. Bard, M. T. Kunkel, and E. G. Peralta
Single Channel Studies of Inward Rectifier Potassium Channel Regulation by Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors
J. Gen. Physiol., November 1, 2000; 116(5): 645 - 652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Physiol.Home page
D. Yakubovich, V. Pastushenko, A. Bitler, C. W Dessauer, and N. Dascal
Slow modal gating of single G protein-activated K+ channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes
J. Physiol., May 1, 2000; 524(3): 737 - 755.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JGPHome page
D. Kim and A. Pleumsamran
Cytoplasmic Unsaturated Free Fatty Acids Inhibit Atp-Dependent Gating of the G Protein-Gated K+ Channel
J. Gen. Physiol., March 1, 2000; 115(3): 287 - 304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
E. B. Stevens, B. S. Shah, R. D. Pinnock, and K. Lee
Bombesin Receptors Inhibit G Protein-Coupled Inwardly Rectifying K+ Channels Expressed in Xenopus Oocytes through a Protein Kinase C-Dependent Pathway
Mol. Pharmacol., June 1, 1999; 55(6): 1020 - 1027.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 JGPHome page
T. T. Ivanova-Nikolova, E. N. Nikolov, C. Hansen, and J. D. Robishaw
Muscarinic K+ Channel in the Heart: Modal Regulation by G Protein {beta}{gamma} Subunits
J. Gen. Physiol., August 1, 1998; 112(2): 199 - 210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. A. Doupnik, N. Davidson, H. A. Lester, and P. Kofuji
RGS proteins reconstitute the rapid gating kinetics of Gbeta gamma -activated inwardly rectifying K+ channels
PNAS, September 16, 1997; 94(19): 10461 - 10466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Corey and D. E. Clapham
The Stoichiometry of Gbeta gamma Binding to G-protein-regulated Inwardly Rectifying K+ Channels (GIRKs)
J. Biol. Chem., March 30, 2001; 276(14): 11409 - 11413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 212K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JGP
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ivanova-Nikolova, T. T.
Right arrow Articles by Breitwieser, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ivanova-Nikolova, T. T.
Right arrow Articles by Breitwieser, G. E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents