|
||
Article |


Department of Anesthesiology, University of California, Los Angeles, School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90095
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Shaker potassium channel fluorescence quenching pore conformational changes
Abbreviations: dF, fluorescence difference; R, intensity ratio; TEA, tetraethylammonium; TMRM, tetramethylrhodamine maleimide
| introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous fluorescence studies of proteins have used measurements of anisotropy and quencher accessibility to answer questions about the fluorophore's environment (reviewed by Eftink, 1991
). Fluorescence anisotropy measures the rotational mobility of the fluorophore and reflects the fluorophore's environmental constraints. For instance, the anisotropy of fluorophore dissolved in glycerol is very high, consistent with a viscous environment. Fluorescence-quenching studies with various molecules such as D2O and iodide have been used to examine fluorophore exposure to the aqueous environment. By modulating the state of the protein and measuring changes in fluorescence quenching, state-specific accessibilities of particular residues can be determined.
Understanding the mechanism of fluorescence quenching can also yield information about the fluorophore's environment. For instance, changes in fluorescence intensity can be caused by reorientation of the fluorophore's transition dipole, leading to a concomitant change in absorption cross-section (Andreev et al., 1993
). Shifts in the excitation spectrum of the dye, which can be caused by fluorophore–fluorophore interactions, can lead to changes in absorption at particular excitation wavelengths and a corresponding change in emission (Burghardt et al., 1996
). Changes in the hydrophobicity of the fluorophore's environment can lead to changes in fluorophore quenching. Finally, nearby protein residues can also interact with and quench the fluorophore. By delineating the specific mechanism of quenching in the Shaker potassium channel, a better understanding of the conformational changes near the S4 segment can be obtained.
We report here that the fluorescence changes in the extracellular region of the S4 segment are affected by different substitutions in the pore. This result was unexpected because interactions between the S4 segment and external pore have not previously been observed. The external application of tetraethylammonium (TEA)1 and agitoxin to a conducting version of the channel also affects the fluorescence quenching through an interaction with the pore. This effect is seen as the elimination of a fluorescence component whose voltage dependence coincides with ionic activation, but whose kinetics are slower. This result suggests that there are conformational changes coupled to channel opening that affect the extracellular portion of the S4 segment and are blocked by TEA or agitoxin.
To better interpret these results, we turned to other techniques to determine the environmental properties of the fluorophore. The modulation of the fluorescence by pH and collisional quenchers, along with anisotropy measurements, indicates that the fluorophore may be interacting with a pH-titratable protein vestibule. This idea is supported by a recent study that suggested that narrow vestibules that line the S4 segment permit the passage of protons but exclude cysteine-reactive reagents (Starace et al., 1997
). These experiments necessitated the development of a new optical technique based on an upright microscope and a water-immersion objective. This technique enabled measurements of fluorescence polarization and increased the efficiency of light collection by a factor of >10 over the previous cut-open oocyte epifluorescence setup.
Although the idea of fluorescence quenching by protein residues was substantiated by these results, several other mechanisms that do not involve protein quenching were tested as possible mechanisms for the signal seen near the S4 segment. Although the quenching mechanism near the S4 segment does not appear to involve a reorientation of the fluorophore, a change in environmental hydrophobicity, or a voltage-dependent excitation shift, a site near the S2 segment does undergo a voltage-dependent excitation shift. Thus, other regions of the protein may undergo different changes in environment.
By combining information from the study of the W434F and T449Y Shaker constructs with other measurements, we propose that the voltage-dependent fluorescence quenching of tetramethylrhodamine maleimide (TMRM) near the S4 segment is modulated by the state of the external pore. In addition, properties of the fluorophore indicate the presence of a nearby protein vestibule that lines the extracellular region of the S4 segment.
| materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The optical setup consisted of a BX50WI microscope (Olympus Optical, Melville, NY) and used excitation filters, dichroic mirrors, and emission filters (Omega Optical, Brattleboro, VT, and Chroma Technologies, Brattleboro, VT) appropriate for tetramethylrhodamine-5-maleimide (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). A microscope tungsten lamp (Carl Zeiss Corp., Thornwood, NY) with a 150-watt filament, powered by a 6286A power supply (Hewlett Packard, Palo Alto, CA), served as the light source. The lamp output was interrupted with a TTL-triggered VS25 shutter (Vincent Associates, Rochester, NY) to minimize photobleaching of the probe.
The LUMPlanFl 40x water-immersion objective had a numerical aperture of 0.8 and working distance of 3.3 mm (Olympus Optical). Light measurements were made with a PIN-020A photodiode (UDT Technologies, Torrance, CA) mounted on an FP-1 fiber optic manipulator (Newport Corp., Irvine, CA), which was attached to the front end of an optical splitter at the microscope's epifluorescence port. The photodiode was attached to the headstage input of an integrating patch clamp amplifier for low noise amplification of the photocurrent. The patch clamp amplifier was an Axopatch-1B (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA), used with an IHS-1 integrating headstage. A circuit with a 45-volt battery (Eveready, St. Louis, MO) and a 10-G
resistor was used to remove integration spikes by offsetting current into the summing junction of the headstage. The fluorescence emission was focused onto the photodiode active area using a microscope condenser lens with a focal distance of 1 cm.
The voltage clamp setup was composed of a top, middle, and bottom chamber (Fig. 1, bottom). The bottom chamber contained the portion of the oocyte that was permeabilized with saponin so that current could be injected directly into the oocyte. The middle chamber served as an electronic guard, and the top chamber, which was painted black, contained the portion of the oocyte membrane from which the fluorescence changes and gating or ionic currents were measured. The voltage electrode measured the membrane potential across the oocyte membrane and was part of the feedback loop that held the interior of the oocyte at virtual ground. Voltage clamp of the oocyte was performed with a CA-1 cut-open oocyte clamp (Dagan Corp., Minneapolis, MN).
Anisotropy and Polarization Measurements
The use of an upright microscope and water-immersion objective enabled measurements of polarization and anisotropy that were previously impossible because the fiber optic used to image the oocyte did not maintain light polarization. With rotatable polarizers in the excitation and emission pathway (Olympus U-AN360; Olympus Optical), two measurements of anisotropy were possible for each polarizer, one in a north–south orientation with respect to the microscope, and the other in an east–west orientation. We measured the fluorescence of labeled, expressing oocytes using all four possible combinations of excitation and emission polarizers: exciter north–south polarized, and emitter either north– south (parallel, I||) or east–west (perpendicular, I
) polarized; or exciter east–west polarized, and emitter either east–west (parallel, I||) or north–south (perpendicular, I
) polarized. By measuring the intensity of fluorescence polarized parallel (I||) and perpendicular (I
) to the excitation light, the steady state anisotropy A of the fluorophore can be calculated using the equation A = (I|| – I
)/(I|| + 2I
), where A ranges between 0 in the completely isotropic case and 0.4 in the completely anisotropic case (Cantor and Schimmel, 1980
). Using the four polarization measurements, two independent calculations of anisotropy can be made. With correction factors to account for the intrinsic polarization properties of the optical path, both calculations should yield the same value of anisotropy, independent of excitation polarization.
The calibration process was done by measuring the anisotropy of a known system, TMRM dissolved in glycerol, and then calculating the correction factor for the north–south and east–west excitation polarizations, which would give the correct anisotropy value from the actual microscope measurements. The anisotropy of TMRM in glycerol is 0.38 (P. Selvin, personal communication); the correction factor was 0.971 in the north–south excitation polarization and 1.312 in the east–west excitation polarization.
The contribution of autofluorescence and fluorescence not arising from channels was quantified by measuring the mean fluorescence intensity from labeled populations of channel-expressing oocytes and comparing them to the fluorescence intensity of labeled and unlabeled nonexpressing oocytes. The results are shown in Table I.
|
Spectral Analysis
Spectra were obtained with a Multispec 257i spectrograph (Oriel Instruments, Stratford, CT) with a 1,200 lines/mm grating for 100 nm bandwidth, attached to an Instaspec V CCD camera with image intensifier cooled to –20°C (Oriel Instruments). The spectrograph and CCD were attached to the rear end of an optical splitter at the epifluorescence port of the microscope.
The filter response of the dichroic mirror was corrected by obtaining the transfer function of the mirror. This was calculated by taking the spectrum obtained by transillumination of the tungsten lamp with mirror and dividing it by the spectrum obtained by transillumination of the lamp alone. Spectra of TMRM in different solvents were measured by dissolving TMRM to a 5-µM concentration, and the measurements were taken with a 535DF35 excitation filter and a 570DRLP dichroic mirror (Omega Optical). Because of the shallow cutoff of the dichroic mirror, spectral characteristics of the signal were maintained to <560 nm with this procedure.
Data Acquisition and Analysis
Gating, ionic, and fluorescence currents were acquired with a PC44 board (Innovative Technologies, Moorpark, CA), which interfaces with a Pentium-based computer via an IBM-compatible AT slot. The fluorescence and electrophysiology were simultaneously acquired on two 16-bit analogue-to-digital converters and transferred to two separate channels of the PC44. When data is sampled at intervals longer than 5 µs (all traces presented in this paper), the program running the PC44 board acquires the data at 5 µs per point, and then decimates the data to the required sampling period after digitally filtering the original data to the new Nyquist frequency. The acquisition program and data analysis programs were developed in house and were run in MS-DOS and Windows 95, respectively.
Molecular Biology, Channel Expression, and Oocyte Labeling
The noninactivating (
6-46, IR) version of the Shaker H4 channel (H4IR) was originally cloned into an engineered version of the pBSTA vector. Two different vector backgrounds were used: a nonconducting version of the channel (W434F), and a conducting version of the channel that tightly binds TEA and agitoxin 2 (T449Y). The agitoxin 2 was kindly provided by Dr. Adrian Gross (UCLA, Los Angeles, CA). For site-directed mutagenesis of all constructs, a two-step PCR protocol (Moore, 1994
) was used to introduce mutations between the XbaI and BglII sites into the Shaker background. After subsequent cloning into the pBSTA vector, the cDNA generated by PCR was sequenced to exclude the possibility of unwanted mutations. The constructs are designated by the original amino acid, residue number, and substituted amino acid (i.e., M356C designates the construct where cysteine was substituted for methionine at residue 356).
The cRNA was transcribed in vitro with the T7 mMessage machine kit (Ambion Inc., Austin, TX), and 50 nl cRNA at a concentration of 100 ng/µl were injected into each Xenopus oocyte. Experiments were performed from 2 to 7 d after injection. The sterile oocyte incubation solution consisted of 100 mM NaCl, 2 mM KCl, 1.8 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 5 mM HEPES, 10 µM EDTA, and 100 µM dithiothreitol.
For fluorescent labeling, Xenopus oocytes were incubated in a depolarizing solution containing 5 µM tetramethylrhodamine-5-maleimide (Mannuzzu et al., 1996
) at 18°C for 40 min.
| results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The properties of the fluorescence signal measured at sites near the S4 segment are also affected by mutations in the external pore. This result was surprising because it has not been shown that the S4 segment is affected by the state of the external pore. In the fluorescence traces for the M356C construct combined with the T449Y mutation in the external pore (M356C T449Y), there is a slow fluorescence component that is visible at large depolarizations and is absent in the M356C construct combined with the W434F mutation in the external pore (M356C W434F) (Fig. 2 A). This component is likely responsible for the shallow voltage dependence seen in the F-V curve of the M356C T449Y construct, in contrast to the M356C W434F construct (Fig. 2 B).
|
The mutations W434F and T449Y, both located in the external mouth of the pore, have very different effects on conduction. The tryptophan-to-phenylalanine mutation at residue 434 (W434F) prevents conduction without affecting the conformational changes that occur in the internal mouth of the pore, as judged from the effects of internal TEA on the gating currents (Perozo et al., 1993
). In comparison, the threonine-to-tyrosine mutation at residue 449 (T449Y) preserves ionic conduction and increases the affinity of ionic blockers such as TEA and agitoxin (MacKinnon and Yellen, 1990
; Heginbotham and MacKinnon, 1992
; Gross and MacKinnon, 1996
). The differences between these two constructs could be attributed either to changes in the movement of the voltage sensor or changes in the fluorophore's environment introduced by the pore mutations. A comparison of the gating currents of conducting and nonconducting (W434F) constructs indicate that the voltage sensor properties do not appear to be altered by this pore substitution (Perozo et al., 1993
). Thus, one possible explanation for the effect is that these pore mutations modify the channel structure so that a different optical profile is seen by the fluorophore. Another possibility is that the state of the external pore may be coupled to the state of the S4 segment in a manner that is not easily observed in the gating currents. A third explanation, which will be addressed in the next section, is that the presence of ion flow through the channel directly affects the fluorophore.
Effects of TEA and Agitoxin on Fluorescence Quenching
To determine whether ion flow through the channel affects fluorophore properties near the S4 segment, we compared the fluorescence signals in the M356C T449Y construct before (Fig. 3 A) and after (Fig. 3 B) the application of external 120 mM TEA-Mes to block the outward flow of potassium. The fluorescence traces are superimposable at small depolarizations but diverge for larger depolarizations. This is more clearly seen in a plot of the fluorescence change versus voltage, or F-V curve (Fig. 3 C). A similar effect in the M356C T449Y construct was seen when ionic current was blocked by the addition of 3 µM agitoxin to the external solution (Fig. 3, D–F). In both cases, the fluorescence quenching became much larger after blocking ionic flow.
|
|
|
We found that none of these results apply to the measured fluorescence difference. First, the voltage dependence of the fluorescence difference saturates at large depolarizations (Fig. 5). Second, the application of TEA or agitoxin actually increases the quenching seen at depolarized potentials (Figs. 3 and 4). To address the third point, we compared the kinetics of the fluorescence difference to ionic current difference. Although the voltage dependence of this signal matches the voltage dependence of ionic conductance (Fig. 5), the kinetics of this signal are significantly slower than those of ionic activation (Fig. 6). For three different potentials for each combination of site and blocker, the ionic current difference and fluorescence difference for each potential were superimposed by normalizing to the final value of a 40-ms pulse from –90 mV. From this comparison, it is apparent that the fluorescence signal is generally slower than the ionic current difference at these potentials for each site and blocker. With regard to the fourth point, when the ionic current reverses direction during repolarization (Figs. 3 and 4, insets), the fluorescence does not demonstrate a similar reversal or increase from the initial intensity level. Instead, the fluorescence decays back to its original level, suggesting that the fluorescence is not directly affected by the direction of ionic flow. Taken together, these observations argue that TEA and agitoxin do not modulate fluorescence by the presence or absence of ion flow. Instead, TEA and agitoxin seem to modulate fluorescence by a mechanism related to their ability to prevent conduction. These molecules may inhibit conformational changes that normally occur in the outside region of the conducting channel. These conformational changes, which are coupled to channel opening, may modulate the fluorescence quenching seen at sites near the S4 segment.
|
Nevertheless, changing the pH shifts the gating charge versus voltage, or Q-V curve, due to changes in the surface charge detected by the voltage sensor (Starace et al., 1997
). Because fluorescence changes at sites near the S4 segment reflect properties of the voltage sensor, the F-V curves at sites M356C and A359C as a function of pH should reflect this shift caused by surface charge. Fig. 7 illustrates the changes that occur in the fluorescence intensity versus voltage curves as a function of pH. As expected, the curve is shifted by the external pH, with pH 5.1 corresponding to the curve shifted most to depolarized potentials.
|
This leads to two possible hypotheses: pH may affect the global conformation of the channel so that the probe interacts with a different region of the channel, or pH may affect the nearby region of protein, which interacts directly with the probe. The global effect of pH, as seen by a shift in the voltage axis, results from the change in surface charge. If this change in surface charge were responsible for conformational changes that modulate the fluorescence, then other methods that change the surface charge should have a similar effect. Increasing the concentration of external calcium mimics the surface charge effects of acidic pH and shifts the Q-V curve to more depolarized potentials. However, changing the calcium concentration from 1.8 to 20 mM shifts the F-V curve without modulating the magnitude of the fluorescence at any potential (Fig. 8). This implies that the fluorescence quenching of the probe is independent of changes in surface charge, which supports the idea that there is a region of protein that interacts directly with the fluorophore. This pH effect could either be direct (nearby residues quench differently because of a change in charge) or indirect (the fluorophore moves to a different environment because of electrostatic changes caused by pH).
|
|
|
The accessibility to D2O at both sites was determined using the same ratios (Fig. 10 B). Since R > 1, the fluorescence intensity increases after the application of D2O at both sites (P < 0.01) (Fig. 10 B, left). Thus, both sites also appear to be accessible to water at –90 and 0 mV. This makes it highly unlikely that the fluorescence change is caused by movement of the fluorophore from a completely hydrophobic environment into the aqueous environment. This was also previously inferred from spectral analysis (Cha and Bezanilla, 1997
).
The ratio of R at –90 mV to R at 0 mV was also calculated for D2O. At site A359C, R–90 mV:R0 mV < 1 (P < 0.01), indicating better access at depolarized potentials. However, M356C shows a value >1 (P < 0.01), indicating that D2O access is favored at hyperpolarized potentials. At first, this result appears to contradict the result obtained with iodide. But the differential access can be explained by the properties of these quenchers. Because iodide is negatively charged, it can show preferential access dependent on electrostatic properties, in contrast to water. Thus, M356C may see a more negatively charged environment at hyperpolarized potentials, which would explain the decreased iodide access, while seeing a larger crevice, which would explain the greater D2O accessibility. Similarly, M356C could also see a more positively charged, but smaller crevice at depolarized potentials.
Differences in Anisotropy Are Consistent with Protein Constraints Near the S4 Segment
Fluorescence anisotropy is a reflection of the rotational freedom of the fluorophore during its excited-state lifetime. If the fluorophore were surrounded by protein, one might also expect that anisotropy of the fluorophore would be affected by constraints imposed by nearby residues. To examine possible constraints on the mobility of the fluorophore, the steady state anisotropy values of TMRM attached to different sites in the channel were measured as a function of holding potential (Fig. 11 A). The measured anisotropy is lowest at the site near the S2 segment (D270C), whereas, near the S4 segment, the anisotropy is lowest at residue V363C and is larger at sites M356C and A359C, regardless of pore mutation. One view of the S4 segment is that some residues in the S4 segment are relatively buried, while more extracellular residues in the S4 segment appear to be more accessible (Larsson et al., 1996
). This data is the opposite of what would be expected if residues in the S4 segment were constrained by protein or lipid, and residues outside the S4 segment lie further from these constraints. In addition, this profile implies that this region near the S4 segment may lie in close proximity to another region of protein that affects the anisotropy of TMRM.
|
Changes in Fluorophore Orientation Are Not Responsible for the Fluorescence Quenching
To test the hypothesis that the voltage-dependent fluorescence changes are due to quenching by a nearby region of protein, we explored two other mechanisms that could explain the fluorescence changes. The first mechanism we tested is a voltage-dependent reorientation of the fluorophore. With polarized excitation light, only those fluorophores with transition dipoles oriented parallel to the polarization of incoming light will be excited; with a polarized emission filter, only the fluorophores that emit light with that polarization will be seen. The change in fluorescence intensity could be caused by a reorientation of the dipole: if the incoming light has polarization properties, which is typical for an epifluorescence setup with a dichroic mirror, then a reorientation of the fluorophore's dipole could change the relative absorption of one incoming polarization with respect to another. This polarization shift could modulate the total intensity of the fluorophore emission as well as the relative polarization intensities of emitted fluorescence.
If the change in fluorescence intensity is caused by a change in orientation of the fluorophore and corresponding transition dipole, then the decrease in emitted fluorescence at one excitation polarization should be accompanied by an increase in fluorescence at the perpendicular polarization. To determine whether a change in polarization was responsible for the voltage-dependent fluorescence changes, the F-V curves at sites M356C and A359C were measured at the four possible orientations of excitation and emission polarization. When examining the normalized change in fluorescence as a function of polarization at these sites, the direction and voltage dependence of fluorescence change is maintained at all possible polarizer orientations, indicating that the fluorescence quenching is not caused by changes in orientation of the fluorophore (Fig. 12). Because the fluorescence signal does not change directions as a function of polarization, it cannot be primarily responsible for the voltage-dependent fluorescence change.
|

1, the fluorescence will increase, whereas, at excitation wavelengths 
2, the fluorescence will decrease.
|
0.5%
F/F), denoted by an upward deflection of the trace, in response to a depolarizing pulse to 0 mV when illuminating with light between 510 and 560 nm (Fig. 13 B). In comparison, when illuminating with light between 453 and 487 nm, the fluorescence increases for the same depolarization. This indicates that different wavelengths excite fluorescence on different sides of an excitation peak that shifts in response to voltage. Fluorescence changes were not previously observed at this site because of insufficient optical sensitivity of the setup. We then examined the normalized fluorescence change as a function of voltage, or F-V curve, at sites M356C and A359C centered at three different wavelengths: 557, 535, and 450 nm. For all filters, the fluorescence decreases in response to depolarizations, and the F-V curve is superimposable at all three excitation wavelengths. This result indicates that there is no excitation shift at either site (Fig. 14). Thus, different fluorescence quenching mechanisms occur in different regions of the channel, and the small fluorescence changes at site D270C arise in a different manner than the large fluorescence changes near the S4 segment. Because the voltage-dependent fluorescence changes in the extracellular region of the S4 segment are not caused by an excitation shift of TMRM, it is unlikely that the underlying mechanism is related to fluorophore–fluorophore interactions, such as dimer formation.
|
| discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The effect of these blockers, as measured by the fluorescence difference before and after application of blocker, appears to share the voltage dependence of ionic activation, albeit with slower kinetics (Fig. 6). These slower kinetics indicate that the conformational changes represented by these traces are not responsible for directly gating ion flow. But the changes are likely coupled to the open state of the channel and may serve as preparatory steps toward slow inactivation. Similar results were obtained in experiments that identified fluorescence changes at sites F425C and T449C in the external pore, which were slower than ionic activation (Cha and Bezanilla, 1997
).
The fluorescence difference also has implications for the structure of the W434F nonconducting construct, whose fluorescence signal is unaffected by TEA or agitoxin. The absence of modulation indicates that the W434F construct may be unable to undergo these external conformational changes near the pore, or that the W434F construct may not effectively bind these blockers. In fact, both hypotheses could hold true, and the mutation may change the pore structure in a manner that prevents conformational changes and reduces TEA and agitoxin affinity. In either case, the W434F mutation alters the structure of the external pore such that the characteristics of the quenching near the S4 segment are different than those seen in the T449Y-conducting construct.
Mechanisms of Fluorescence Quenching in the Shaker Potassium Channel
By studying the mechanism of fluorescence quenching near the S4 segment, we hoped to elucidate the characteristics of the environment surrounding these residues. To this end, several potential quenching mechanisms were ruled out as being responsible for the large voltage-dependent changes in fluorescence intensity. Polarization and excitation shift experiments indicate that neither a reorientation of the fluorophore nor a shift of excitation wavelengths are responsible for the fluorescence change. In addition, access to the fluorophore by D2O at –90 and 0 mV argues strongly against a movement of the fluorophore from a completely hydrophobic environment into an aqueous environment. Thus, the remaining quenching mechanism, voltage-dependent quenching by nearby protein residues, becomes the most likely candidate.
Several other observations support protein-based quenching as the actual mechanism. Modulation of fluorescence by the state of the external pore suggests that the fluorophore may interact with residues affected by the state of the pore. In addition, anisotropy measurements indicate that the environment near the fluorophore becomes more constrained at sites near the S4 segment that show a large fluorescence change (M356C, A359C) than at sites near the S2 segment (D270C) or in the S4 segment itself (V363C), which show little or no fluorescence change. Experiments examining pH titration and the relative accessibility of different quenchers suggest the existence of nearby electrostatic and steric constraints, which are best explained by interactions with a nearby protein vestibule. Thus, the voltage-dependent quenching near the S4 segment appears to depend on quenching by nearby protein residues, which has been seen in other systems (Conibear et al., 1996
; Coelho-Sampaio and Voss, 1993
).
Properties of a Putative Protein Vestibule Near the S4 Segment
An extracellular protein vestibule near the S4 segment has been proposed, based on histidine scanning mutagenesis (Starace et al., 1997
). The experiments presented in this paper can be used to visualize characteristics of residues lining part of this vestibule. An important caveat is that the properties of the environment of residues near the S4 segment have been inferred from characteristics of the fluorophore, which is attached to the residue of interest with a maleimide linker. With a typical length of
7 Å, the cysteine-reactive maleimide linker acts as a tether that cannot completely constrain the position of the fluorophore near the residue. The implications of structural features near the labeled site must be made with the knowledge that these structures lie within the reach of a molecule that contains both fluorophore and linker (see Table II).
|
If the probe is quenched by a residue or group of residues whose ability to quench is pH dependent, likely candidates include aspartic and glutamic acid (pKa
4–5), as judged from the marked effects and lack of saturation near pH 5 (Fig. 7). Thus, the pH titration data, which indicates possible interaction with glutamic or aspartic acid at hyperpolarized potentials, are consistent with the hypothesis that the fluorophore may lie in a negatively charged environment in the closed state of the channel.
This information, summarized in Table II, can be used to create a preliminary picture of the vestibule near the S4 segment (Fig. 15). This illustration highlights the distinctive properties of these three sites at –90 and 0 mV, particularly at site M356C, which behaves differently than the other sites. This diagram models the movement of the S4 segment as a change in orientation, or tilt, with respect to the transmembrane field (Papazian and Bezanilla, 1997
). The negative region of protein near the extracellular S4 segment at –90 mV is consistent with the pH data, and the positive region of protein at –90 mV is consistent with the iodide quenching data. The relative proximity of protein regions to the residues reflects the anisotropy data. This vestibule may also be involved in inhibiting the movement of the voltage sensor after the attachment of charged methanethiosulfonate reagents to sites M356C, A359C, and V363C near the S4 segment (Cheney et al., 1998
). Although this gives no more than a rough picture of the environment surrounding the extracellular portion of the S4 segment, it gives a reasonable physical basis to explain the quenching of the fluorophore by the lining of the hydrophilic vestibule.
|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant GM-30376 and the Hagiwara Chair funds to F. Bezanilla. A. Cha is also supported by the UCLA Medical Scientist Training Program (GM-08042) and a National Research Service Award from the National Institute of Mental Health (MH-12087).
Submitted: 19 May 1998
Accepted: 28 July 1998
| references |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Perozo Shedding Light on Voltage-dependent Gating J. Gen. Physiol., October 1, 1998; 112(4): 373 - 376. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|