The Journal of General Physiology
Cell MicroControls
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Correction for Kontis et al., J. Gen. Physiol. 110 (4) 391-401.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 86K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JGP
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kontis
Right arrow Articles by Goldin., A.L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kontis,
Right arrow Articles by Goldin., A.L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
© The Rockefeller University Press, 0022-1295/1997//763/ $5.00
Journal of General Physiology, Volume 110, Number 6, 1997


Correction

The Journal of General Physiology. Volume 110, No. 4, October 1997.

Kontis, K.J., A. Rounaghi, and A.L. Goldin.


Page 391.
Table IV referred to previous data from Chen et al. (1996) concerning mutations in domain IV of the sodium channel. However, the numbering system for mutations in domain IV used by Chen et al. (1996) differed from that used in this paper. Therefore, two mutants were labeled incorrectly. Mutant 4R1Q should have been termed 4R0Q, and mutant 4R3Q should have been termed 4R2Q. The corrected table is reprinted below.
Table IV Summary of Charge-neutralizing Mutation Effects on Activation

Mutant v1/2 shift* zm change (e0)*
mV
1R1Q{ddagger} +3.3 –0.6
1R1Q§ –2.0 0.0
1R2Q –1.0 +0.4
1R2Q§ –8.0 –1.8||
1R3Q{ddagger} +4.7176 –1.7176
1R3Q§ +12.0 –1.5||
1K4Q +18.5176 –1.2176
1K4Q§ +19.0 –0.9||
2R1Q{ddagger} +13.3176 –1.2176
2R2Q +4.4176 –1.1176
2R3Q{ddagger} +0.4176 –1.6176
2K4Q +14.9176 –0.7
2K5Q§ +10.0 0.0
3K1Q{ddagger} –10.4176 –0.5
3R2Q –0.3 +0.4
3R3Q{ddagger} +5.9176 –2.1176
3R4Q –18.1176 +0.3
4R0Q{ddagger} +2.3 –1.6176
4R2Q +3.6176 –0.5
4R2Q{ddagger} +8.6176 –1.6176
4R4Q +0.4 +0.9

* v1/2 and zm are the half-maximal voltage and gating valence of activation. Data from Stühmer et al. (1989) did not include an assessment of statistical significance.  

{ddagger} Data from Chen et al. (1996).  

§ Data from Stühmer et al. (1989).  

|| The values for zm from Stühmer et al. (1989) were multiplied by three for comparison because those values were based on three identical gating charges (m3).  

176 Values statistically significant, with a probability <0.05 resulting from random variation.  



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 86K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JGP
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kontis
Right arrow Articles by Goldin., A.L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kontis,
Right arrow Articles by Goldin., A.L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents