The Journal of General Physiology
Avanti Polar Lipids, Inc.
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Correction for Zou et al., J. Gen. Physiol. 114 (4) 575-588.
Published online 1 December 1999.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 15K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JGP
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
© The Rockefeller University Press, 0022-1295/1999//839/ $5.00
Journal of General Physiology, Volume 114, Number 6, 1999


Correction


© 1999 The Rockefeller University Press

Page 577

Due to an editorial error, rate constant units in the first column, last paragraph, were printed incorrectly. The affected paragraph appears (corrected) here:

For the simulations, the following parameters were used: channel opening of 600 ms with a 1.2-pA Ca2+ current; initial free intracellular Ca2+ concentration of 100 nM; total endogenous stationary buffer concentration of 230 µM and total fluo-3 concentration of 50 µM; an on-rate of 80 (µM · s)–1 for fluo-3 and 100 (µM · s)–1 for the stationary buffer; an off-rate of 90 s–1 for fluo-3 and 100 s–1 for the stationary buffer (yielding a Kd of 1.13 µM for fluo-3 and 1 µM for the stationary buffer); a diffusion constant of 2.5 x 10–6 cm2/s for Ca2+ and 2.2 x 10–7 cm2 /s for free and Ca2+-bound fluo-3. The effects of plasma membrane pumps and leaks were negligible and no other intracellular activity (e.g., Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release, Ca2+ uptake) was included. Diffusion, rate and dissociation constants, and the concentration of stationary buffer are from Smith et al. (1998) or Kargacin and Fay (1991).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 15K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JGP
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents