Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF, 98K) PPT slides of all figures Alert me when this article is cited Services Email this article Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new content in the JGP Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

Correction

Pages 18 and 20

Due to an editorial error Fig. 9 and Fig. 10 were inadvertently switched, appearing with the incorrect legends. The figures and legends appear below correctly.

View larger version (27K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Figure 9 The photoreceptor membrane characteristics at different light adaptation levels. The photoreceptor impedance, Z, (f) calculated from the current injection and the resulting voltage responses, is reduced (A, gain), it is accelerated (B, 3-dB cut-off frequency) and it lags the stimulus less (C, phase) when it is shifted towards higher frequencies with increasing light adaptation. Regardless of the adapting background the membrane operates linearly over the studied frequency range (in D,exp2(f) and in E,SNR2(f); coherence close to unity). Both the normalized impedance (F) and the gain of the contrast-induced voltage responses (i.e., light response), (G) demonstrate a gradual shift of their bandwidth towards high frequencies. The cut-off frequency of the impedance is always much higher than that of the light responses in the same photoreceptor at the same adapting background; in this particular photoreceptor, 3.1, 1.9, 3.2, 5.1, and 4.2 times higher, when going from BG-4 to BG0.

View larger version (25K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Figure 10 General comparison of the transduction signal and noise and membrane bandwidth at different adapting backgrounds. (A–C) The dynamics of the corresponding light current, voltage response, and membrane impedance displayed as their normalized gain. (A) Under dim conditions, the light current is noisy and the low passing membrane removes the high frequency noise, producing slow voltage responses to light contrasts. When the mean light intensity is increased, both the transduction cascade and photoreceptor membrane allows faster signaling leading to accelerated voltage responses (B and C). The corresponding impulse responses (D), calculated from the same data, show how the light current and voltage responses quicken with increasing mean light intensity, but the light current is always peaking before its respective voltage response. Because of the large membrane impedance under dim conditions, the small light currents can charge relatively large voltage responses. The responses are normalized by the maximum value of each series. (E–G) The transduction bump noise, |I{small tilde}(f)|, was calculated by deconvolving the photoreceptor membrane impedance, Z(f ), from the respective voltage bump noise, |V{small tilde}(f)|. From dim light conditions (E and F) to the bright adapting backgrounds (G) |I{small tilde}(f)| shows a considerable overlap with the corresponding membrane impedance.

CiteULike

Complore

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Facebook

Reddit

Technorati

Twitter

This Article Full Text (PDF, 98K) PPT slides of all figures Alert me when this article is cited Services Email this article Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new content in the JGP Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                            What's this?