Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Newest Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
    • Special Collections
  • Reviews & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Research News
    • Essays
    • Commentaries
    • Perspectives
    • Milestones in Physiology
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
  • Alerts
  • About
    • About JGP
    • History
    • Editors & Staff
    • Permissions & Licensing
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Publication Fees
    • Author Services
  • Subscriptions
  • Rockefeller University Press
  • JCB
  • JEM
  • JGP
  • LSA

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
JGP
  • Rockefeller University Press
  • JCB
  • JEM
  • JGP
  • LSA
  • Log in
JGP

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Newest Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
    • Special Collections
  • Reviews & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Research News
    • Essays
    • Commentaries
    • Perspectives
    • Milestones in Physiology
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
  • Alerts
  • About
    • About JGP
    • History
    • Editors & Staff
    • Permissions & Licensing
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Publication Fees
    • Author Services
  • Subscriptions

You are here

jgp Home » 2018 Archive » 3 September » 150 (9): 1233
Commentary

The fast block to polyspermy: New insight into a century-old problem

View ORCID ProfileLaurinda A. Jaffe  Correspondence email
Laurinda A. Jaffe
Department of Cell Biology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Laurinda A. Jaffe
  • For correspondence: ljaffe@uchc.edu
DOI: 10.1085/jgp.201812145 | Published August 6, 2018
  • Article
  • Info
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

One of the central questions about fertilization is how only one sperm fertilizes each egg. For most species, the formation of a mechanical barrier is a key component. However, because this process takes time, some species use a fast electrically mediated block to protect the egg in the intervening period (Jaffe and Cross, 1986; Iwao and Izaki, 2018). Two papers in the Journal of General Physiology (see Wozniak, Phelps, et al., and Wozniak, Tembo, et al., in this issue) provide new insights about how this occurs.

Almost exactly 100 yr ago, E.E. Just (1919) observed that in the ∼30-s period between insemination of a sand dollar egg and elevation of the mechanical barrier, many sperm reach the egg surface, but only one succeeds in entering. Just concluded that “before the membrane begins lifting at the site of sperm entry, sperm can no longer enter at any point on the egg.” Soon thereafter, J. Gray (1922) suggested that an electrical mechanism might be responsible. However, it was not until later that Tyler et al. (1956) reported the first successful microelectrode recording during fertilization and showed that the starfish egg membrane indeed depolarizes. 20 yr later, as a graduate student in the laboratory of S. Hagiwara, I demonstrated that this depolarization, or “fertilization potential,” provides a fast block to polyspermy in sea urchin eggs (Jaffe, 1976).

Since that time, electrical polyspermy blocks have been described in many species, including frogs. In frog eggs, the depolarization results from a calcium-mediated increase in chloride permeability, allowing chloride to move from the cytosol to the low chloride “pond water” environment where fertilization occurs (Cross and Elinson, 1980; Grey et al., 1982; Kline, 1988). The calcium rise is caused by the opening of IP3-gated calcium channels in the endoplasmic reticulum (Runft et al., 1999). In two companion papers, Wozniak et al. (2018a,b) show directly that IP3 mediates the fertilization potential in eggs from the frog Xenopus laevis, and they identify the chloride channel that is responsible as TMEM16A.

To investigate the source of the calcium that activates the chloride channel, Wozniak et al. (2018b) used existing proteomic and RNA sequencing datasets to identify candidate calcium channels in the plasma membrane and intracellular membranes of the Xenopus egg. Two plasma membrane candidates were identified, but broad spectrum plasma membrane calcium channel inhibitors did not inhibit the fertilization potential, indicating that extracellular calcium is not needed. However, an IP3 receptor antagonist (Xestospongin C) and a phospholipase C inhibitor (U73122) completely suppressed the fertilization potential and induced polyspermy, indicating that IP3-induced calcium release is responsible for the fertilization potential.

To investigate which chloride channel gives rise to the calcium-induced depolarization at fertilization, Wozniak et al. (2018a) again used proteomic and RNA sequencing databases to identify candidates. The pharmacological properties of these candidate channels were characterized by expressing them exogenously in axolotl oocytes, which lack endogenous calcium-activated chloride channels. Inhibitors of the chloride channel xTMEM16a were then shown to inhibit the fertilization-induced depolarization in Xenopus eggs and induce polyspermy, revealing that xTMEM16a is the calcium-activated chloride channel responsible for the depolarization.

Two major questions about the electrical polyspermy block remain to be elucidated. First, how does the sperm–egg interaction result in IP3 production and calcium release in the egg? And second, how does the voltage across the egg plasma membrane regulate fusion of the sperm and egg membranes?

With regard to the first of these questions, fertilization of Xenopus eggs activates IP3 production by a pathway involving phosphorylation and activation of phospholipase Cγ (PLCγ; Sato et al., 2000), although this signaling pathway is not mediated by the SH2 domains of PLCγ as in other systems (Runft et al., 1999). In mammalian eggs, IP3 is also produced in response to fertilization. Part, but not all, of the mammalian mechanism for stimulating IP3 production is delivery of phospholipase C (PLCζ) from the sperm to the egg as a consequence of fusion of the sperm and egg plasma membranes (Saunders et al., 2002; Hachem et al., 2017; Nozawa et al., 2018). Whether Xenopus sperm also deliver PLCζ, or another phospholipase C, to the Xenopus egg remains to be determined.

The question of what confers voltage sensitivity to sperm–egg fusion has been elusive for decades. Early studies supported the hypothesis that voltage sensitivity might result from insertion of a positively charged molecule from the sperm into the egg membrane as part of the cell–cell fusion process (Jaffe and Cross, 1986; Iwao and Jaffe, 1989). Recent studies have identified a matrix metalloproteinase, MMP2, that is expressed on the Xenopus sperm surface and includes a positively charged peptide domain that may contribute to the voltage dependence of sperm–egg fusion (Iwao et al., 2014).

Fusion of viruses with their target cells has provided an important model for studies of sperm–egg fusion. The fusion of virus membranes with cell membranes is mediated by the insertion of a “fusion protein” from the virus, and for “class 2” and “class 3” viruses, this process is inhibited if the target cell membrane is clamped at a positive voltage (Markosyan and Cohen, 2010).

Sperm of flowering plants such as Arabidopsis thaliana express a transmembrane protein, HAP2, that has a structure similar to that of viral fusion proteins and is required for sperm–egg fusion (von Besser et al., 2006; Valansi et al., 2017; Fédry et al., 2018). Arabidopsis HAP2 has an extracellular loop that is thought to insert into the egg membrane to mediate fusion, containing charged amino acids interspersed with nonpolar residues (Valansi et al., 2017; Fédry et al., 2018). Conceivably, these charges, or those in other regions of the HAP2 protein (Wong et al., 2010), could confer voltage sensitivity to sperm–egg fusion, although it is unknown whether membrane fusion mediated by HAP2 shows the voltage dependency seen with viral fusion proteins. It is also unknown whether the Arabidopsis egg membrane depolarizes at fertilization, or whether sperm–egg fusion in Arabidopsis is voltage dependent. HAP2 is expressed in gametes of other species as well, including some protozoa and animals. Whether HAP2 or another a similar fusion protein is present in sperm from species in which fertilization is known to be voltage dependent, such as Xenopus, remains to be determined.

Acknowledgments

Research in the author's laboratory is supported by a grant from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R37HD014939).

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Merritt C. Maduke served as editor.

Creative Commons logoCreative Commons logohttp://www.rupress.org/terms/https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms/). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 International license, as described at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).

References

  1. ↵
    1. Cross, N.L., and
    2. R.P. Elinson
    . 1980. A fast block to polyspermy in frogs mediated by changes in the membrane potential. Dev. Biol. 75:187–198. doi:10.1016/0012-1606(80)90154-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Fédry, J.,
    2. J. Forcina,
    3. P. Legrand,
    4. G. Péhau-Arnaudet,
    5. A. Haouz,
    6. M. Johnson,
    7. F.A. Rey, and
    8. T. Krey
    . 2018. Evolutionary diversification of the HAP2 membrane insertion motifs to drive gamete fusion across eukaryotes. PLoS Biol. In press.
  3. ↵
    1. Gray, J.
    1922. A critical study of the facts of artificial fertilization and normal fertilization. Q. J. Microsc. Sci. 66:419–437.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Grey, R.D.,
    2. M.J. Bastiani,
    3. D.J. Webb, and
    4. E.R. Schertel
    . 1982. An electrical block is required to prevent polyspermy in eggs fertilized by natural mating of Xenopus laevis. Dev. Biol. 89:475–484. doi:10.1016/0012-1606(82)90335-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Hachem, A.,
    2. J. Godwin,
    3. M. Ruas,
    4. H.C. Lee,
    5. M. Ferrer Buitrago,
    6. G. Ardestani,
    7. A. Bassett,
    8. S. Fox,
    9. F. Navarrete,
    10. P. de Sutter, et al.
    2017. PLCζ is the physiological trigger of the Ca2+ oscillations that induce embryogenesis in mammals but conception can occur in its absence. Development. 144:2914–2924. doi:10.1242/dev.150227
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Iwao, Y., and
    2. K. Izaki
    . 2018. Universality and diversity of a fast, electrical block to polyspermy during fertilization in animals. In Reproductive and Developmental Strategies. K. Kobayashi, T. Kitano, Y. Iwao, and M. Kondo, editors. Springer, Japan. 499–533., doi:10.1007/978-4-431-56609-0_24
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. Iwao, Y., and
    2. L.A. Jaffe
    . 1989. Evidence that the voltage-dependent component in the fertilization process is contributed by the sperm. Dev. Biol. 134:446–451. doi:10.1016/0012-1606(89)90117-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Iwao, Y.,
    2. K. Shiga,
    3. A. Shiroshita,
    4. T. Yoshikawa,
    5. M. Sakiie,
    6. T. Ueno,
    7. S. Ueno,
    8. T.W. Ijiri, and
    9. K. Sato
    . 2014. The need of MMP-2 on the sperm surface for Xenopus fertilization: its role in a fast electrical block to polyspermy. Mech. Dev. 134:80–95. doi:10.1016/j.mod.2014.09.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Jaffe, L.A.
    1976. Fast block to polyspermy in sea urchin eggs is electrically mediated. Nature. 261:68–71. doi:10.1038/261068a0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Jaffe, L.A., and
    2. N.L. Cross
    . 1986. Electrical regulation of sperm-egg fusion. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 48:191–200. doi:10.1146/annurev.ph.48.030186.001203
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Just, E.E.
    1919. The fertilization reaction in Echinarachnus parma. I. Cortical response of the egg to insemination. Biol. Bull. 36:1–10. doi:10.2307/1536454
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    1. Kline, D.
    1988. Calcium-dependent events at fertilization of the frog egg: injection of a calcium buffer blocks ion channel opening, exocytosis, and formation of pronuclei. Dev. Biol. 126:346–361. doi:10.1016/0012-1606(88)90145-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Markosyan, R.M., and
    2. F.S. Cohen
    . 2010. Negative potentials across biological membranes promote fusion by class II and class III viral proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell. 21:2001–2012. doi:10.1091/mbc.e09-10-0904
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Nozawa, K.,
    2. Y. Satouh,
    3. T. Fujimoto,
    4. A. Oji, and
    5. M. Ikawa
    . 2018. Sperm-borne phospholipase C zeta-1 ensures monospermic fertilization in mice. Sci. Rep. 8:1315. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-19497-6
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. ↵
    1. Runft, L.L.,
    2. J. Watras, and
    3. L.A. Jaffe
    . 1999. Calcium release at fertilization of Xenopus eggs requires type I IP(3) receptors, but not SH2 domain-mediated activation of PLCgamma or G(q)-mediated activation of PLCbeta. Dev. Biol. 214:399–411. doi:10.1006/dbio.1999.9415
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Sato, K.,
    2. A.A. Tokmakov,
    3. T. Iwasaki, and
    4. Y. Fukami
    . 2000. Tyrosine kinase-dependent activation of phospholipase Cgamma is required for calcium transient in Xenopus egg fertilization. Dev. Biol. 224:453–469. doi:10.1006/dbio.2000.9782
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Saunders, C.M.,
    2. M.G. Larman,
    3. J. Parrington,
    4. L.J. Cox,
    5. J. Royse,
    6. L.M. Blayney,
    7. K. Swann, and
    8. F.A. Lai
    . 2002. PLC ζ: a sperm-specific trigger of Ca2+ oscillations in eggs and embryo development. Development. 129:3533–3544.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Tyler, A.,
    2. A. Monroy,
    3. C.Y. Kao, and
    4. H. Grundfest
    . 1956. Membrane potential and resistance of the starfish egg before and after fertilization. Biol. Bull. 111:153–177. doi:10.2307/1539191
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. ↵
    1. Valansi, C.,
    2. D. Moi,
    3. E. Leikina,
    4. E. Matveev,
    5. M. Graña,
    6. L.V. Chernomordik,
    7. H. Romero,
    8. P.S. Aguilar, and
    9. B. Podbilewicz
    . 2017. Arabidopsis HAP2/GCS1 is a gamete fusion protein homologous to somatic and viral fusogens. J. Cell Biol. 216:571–581. doi:10.1083/jcb.201610093
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. von Besser, K.,
    2. A.C. Frank,
    3. M.A. Johnson, and
    4. D. Preuss
    . 2006. Arabidopsis HAP2 (GCS1) is a sperm-specific gene required for pollen tube guidance and fertilization. Development. 133:4761–4769. doi:10.1242/dev.02683
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Wong, J.L.,
    2. A.R. Leydon, and
    3. M.A. Johnson
    . 2010. HAP2(GCS1)-dependent gamete fusion requires a positively charged carboxy-terminal domain. PloS Genetics 6(3):e1000882. https://doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000882
  22. ↵
    1. Wozniak, K.L.,
    2. W.A. Phelps,
    3. M. Tembo,
    4. M.T. Lee, and
    5. A.E. Carlson
    . 2018a. The TMEM16A channel mediates the fast polyspermy block in Xenopus laevis. J. Gen. Physiol. doi:10.1085/jgp.201812071
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. ↵
    1. Wozniak, K.L.,
    2. M. Tembo,
    3. W.A. Phelps,
    4. M.T. Lee, and
    5. A.E. Carlson
    . 2018b. PLC and IP3-evoked Ca2+ release initiate the fast block to polyspermy in Xenopus laevis eggs. J. Gen. Physiol. doi:10.1085/jgp.201812069
    OpenUrlCrossRef
© 2018 Jaffe http://www.rupress.org/terms/https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms/). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 International license, as described at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
Previous articleNext article
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
The fast block to polyspermy: New insight into a century-old problem
Laurinda A. Jaffe
The Journal of General Physiology Sep 2018, 150 (9) 1233-1234; DOI: 10.1085/jgp.201812145

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address

Email logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo Reddit logo CiteULike logo LinkedIn logo

The Journal of General Physiology: 151 (2)

Current Issue

February 4, 2019
Volume 151, No. 2

  • Table of Contents
  • All Issues

Jump To

  • Article
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Info
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
 

ARTICLES

  • Current Issue
  • Newest Articles
  • Archive
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds

FOR AUTHORS

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors

ABOUT

  • About JGP
  • Editors & Staff
  • Permissions & Licensing
  • Advertise
  • Feedback
  • Newsroom
  • Privacy Policy

CONNECT WITH JGP

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS
  • Instagram

Online ISSN: 1540-7748
Print ISSN: 0022-1295

Copyright © 2019 JGP by Rockefeller University Press