Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Newest Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
    • Special Collections
  • Reviews & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Research News
    • Essays
    • Commentaries
    • Perspectives
    • Milestones in Physiology
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
  • Alerts
  • About
    • About JGP
    • History
    • Editors & Staff
    • Permissions & Licensing
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Publication Fees
    • Author Services
  • Subscriptions
  • Rockefeller University Press
  • JCB
  • JEM
  • JGP
  • LSA

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
JGP
  • Rockefeller University Press
  • JCB
  • JEM
  • JGP
  • LSA
  • Log in
JGP

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Newest Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
    • Special Collections
  • Reviews & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Research News
    • Essays
    • Commentaries
    • Perspectives
    • Milestones in Physiology
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
  • Alerts
  • About
    • About JGP
    • History
    • Editors & Staff
    • Permissions & Licensing
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Publication Fees
    • Author Services
  • Subscriptions
Hypothesis

The binding interactions that maintain excitation–contraction coupling junctions in skeletal muscle

View ORCID ProfileEduardo Ríos  Correspondence email, View ORCID ProfileDirk Gillespie, Clara Franzini-Armstrong  Correspondence email
Eduardo Ríos
Section of Cellular Signaling, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Rush University, Chicago, IL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Eduardo Ríos
  • For correspondence: erios@rush.edu
Dirk Gillespie
Section of Cellular Signaling, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Rush University, Chicago, IL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Dirk Gillespie
Clara Franzini-Armstrong
Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: armstroc@pennmedicine.upenn.edu
DOI: 10.1085/jgp.201812268 | Published February 6, 2019
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Calcium for contraction of skeletal muscles is released via tetrameric ryanodine receptor (RYR1) channels of the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR), which are assembled in ordered arrays called couplons at junctions where the SR abuts T tubules or plasmalemma. Voltage-gated Ca2+ (CaV1.1) channels, found in tubules or plasmalemma, form symmetric complexes called CaV tetrads that associate with and activate underlying RYR tetramers during membrane depolarization by conveying a conformational change. Intriguingly, CaV tetrads regularly skip every other RYR tetramer within the array; therefore, the RYRs underlying tetrads (named V), but not the voltage sensor–lacking (C) RYRs, should be activated by depolarization. Here we hypothesize that the checkerboard association is maintained solely by reversible binary interactions between CaVs and RYRs and test this hypothesis using a quantitative model of the energies that govern CaV1.1–RYR1 binding, which are assumed to depend on number and location of bound CaVs. A Monte Carlo simulation generates large statistical samples and distributions of state variables that can be compared with quantitative features in freeze-fracture images of couplons from various sources. This analysis reveals two necessary model features: (1) the energy of a tetramer must have wells at low and high occupation by CaVs, so that CaVs positively cooperate in binding RYR (an allosteric effect), and (2) a large energy penalty results when two CaVs bind simultaneously to adjacent RYR protomers in adjacent tetramers (a steric clash). Under the hypothesis, V and C channels will eventually reverse roles. Role reversal justifies the presence of sensor-lacking C channels, as a structural and functional reserve for control of muscle contraction.

  • Submitted: 1 October 2018
  • Accepted: 2 January 2019
Creative Commons logoCreative Commons logohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This article is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International, as described at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

View Full Text
© 2019 Ríos et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International, as described at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Previous articleNext article
Back to top
Download PDF
PDF + Supp Data
Citation Tools
The binding interactions that maintain excitation–contraction coupling junctions in skeletal muscle
Eduardo Ríos, Dirk Gillespie, Clara Franzini-Armstrong
The Journal of General Physiology Feb 2019, jgp.201812268; DOI: 10.1085/jgp.201812268

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address

Email logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo Reddit logo CiteULike logo LinkedIn logo
The Journal of General Physiology: 151 (2)

Current Issue

February 4, 2019
Volume 151, No. 2

  • Table of Contents
  • All Issues

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
 

Subjects

  • Molecular Physiology
  • Cellular Physiology
  • Biophysics

ARTICLES

  • Current Issue
  • Newest Articles
  • Archive
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds

FOR AUTHORS

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors

ABOUT

  • About JGP
  • Editors & Staff
  • Permissions & Licensing
  • Advertise
  • Feedback
  • Newsroom
  • Privacy Policy

CONNECT WITH JGP

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS
  • Instagram

Online ISSN: 1540-7748
Print ISSN: 0022-1295

Copyright © 2019 JGP by Rockefeller University Press